IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v198y2009i2p576-601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An improved multiobjective differential evolution based on Pareto-adaptive [epsilon]-dominance and orthogonal design

Author

Listed:
  • Gong, Wenyin
  • Cai, Zhihua

Abstract

Evolutionary multiobjective optimization has become a very popular topic in the last few years. Since the 1980s, various evolutionary approaches that are capable of searching for multiple solutions simultaneously in a single run have been developed to solve multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs). However, to find a uniformly distributed, near-complete, and near-optimal Pareto front in a small number of fitness function evaluations (NFFEs) is a challenging task for any multiobjective optimization evolutionary algorithm (MOEA). In this paper, we present an improved differential evolution algorithm to MOPs that combines several features of previous evolutionary algorithms in a unique manner. It is characterized by (a) employing the orthogonal design method with quantization technique to generate the initial population, (b) adopting an archive to store the nondominated solutions and employing the new Pareto-adaptive [epsilon]-dominance method to update the archive at each generation, (c) storing the extreme points and inserting them into the final archive in order to remedy one of the limitations of [epsilon]-dominance: the loss of the extreme points in the final archive, and (d) using a hybrid selection mechanism in which a random selection and an elitist selection are alternated in order to allow using the archive solution to guide the search towards the Pareto-optimal front. Experiments have been conducted on a number of unconstrained real-valued artificial functions of two and three objectives. The results prove the efficiency of our approach with respect to the quality of the approximation of the Pareto-optimal front and the considerable reduction of NFFEs in these test problems. By examining the selected performance metrics, our approach is found to be statistically competitive with five state-of-the-art MOEAs in terms of keeping the diversity of the individuals along the tradeoff surface, finding a well-approximated Pareto-optimal front and reducing the computational effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Gong, Wenyin & Cai, Zhihua, 2009. "An improved multiobjective differential evolution based on Pareto-adaptive [epsilon]-dominance and orthogonal design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 576-601, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:198:y:2009:i:2:p:576-601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(08)00770-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beume, Nicola & Naujoks, Boris & Emmerich, Michael, 2007. "SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1653-1669, September.
    2. Beausoleil, Ricardo P., 2006. ""MOSS" multiobjective scatter search applied to non-linear multiple criteria optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 426-449, March.
    3. Hanne, Thomas, 2007. "A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for approximating the efficient set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1723-1734, February.
    4. Chen, Min-Rong & Lu, Yong-Zai, 2008. "A novel elitist multiobjective optimization algorithm: Multiobjective extremal optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(3), pages 637-651, August.
    5. Elaoud, Semya & Loukil, Taicir & Teghem, Jacques, 2007. "The Pareto fitness genetic algorithm: Test function study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1703-1719, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaohui Yuan & Xiaotao Wu & Hao Tian & Yanbin Yuan & Rana Muhammad Adnan, 2016. "Parameter Identification of Nonlinear Muskingum Model with Backtracking Search Algorithm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(8), pages 2767-2783, June.
    2. Mansourfar, Gholamreza & Mohamad, Shamsher & Hassan, Taufiq, 2010. "The behavior of MENA oil and non-oil producing countries in international portfolio optimization," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 415-423, November.
    3. Lochtefeld, Darrell F. & Ciarallo, Frank W., 2015. "Multi-objectivization Via Decomposition: An analysis of helper-objectives and complete decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 395-404.
    4. Yulong Xu & Jian-an Fang & Wu Zhu & Xiaopeng Wang & Lingdong Zhao, 2015. "Differential evolution using a superior–inferior crossover scheme," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 243-274, May.
    5. Mahalec, Vladimir & Chen, Yingwu & Liu, Xiaolu & He, Renjie & Sun, Kai, 2015. "Reconfiguration of satellite orbit for cooperative observation using variable-size multi-objective differential evolutionAuthor-Name: Chen, Yingguo," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 10-20.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Jianyong & Lin, Qiuzhen & Ji, Zhen, 2010. "A hybrid immune multiobjective optimization algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 294-302, July.
    2. Lochtefeld, Darrell F. & Ciarallo, Frank W., 2015. "Multi-objectivization Via Decomposition: An analysis of helper-objectives and complete decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 395-404.
    3. Chen, Min-Rong & Lu, Yong-Zai, 2008. "A novel elitist multiobjective optimization algorithm: Multiobjective extremal optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(3), pages 637-651, August.
    4. Laumanns, Marco & Zenklusen, Rico, 2011. "Stochastic convergence of random search methods to fixed size Pareto front approximations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 414-421, September.
    5. Wang, Haijun & Du, Lijing & Ma, Shihua, 2014. "Multi-objective open location-routing model with split delivery for optimized relief distribution in post-earthquake," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 160-179.
    6. Liagkouras, Konstantinos & Metaxiotis, Konstantinos, 2021. "Improving multi-objective algorithms performance by emulating behaviors from the human social analogue in candidate solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1019-1036.
    7. Andrea Ponti & Antonio Candelieri & Ilaria Giordani & Francesco Archetti, 2023. "Intrusion Detection in Networks by Wasserstein Enabled Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    8. David Quintana & Roman Denysiuk & Sandra García-Rodríguez & Antonio Gaspar-Cunha, 2017. "Portfolio implementation risk management using evolutionary multiobjective optimization," Post-Print hal-01881379, HAL.
    9. Yunsong Han & Hong Yu & Cheng Sun, 2017. "Simulation-Based Multiobjective Optimization of Timber-Glass Residential Buildings in Severe Cold Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Ivo Couckuyt & Dirk Deschrijver & Tom Dhaene, 2014. "Fast calculation of multiobjective probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria for Pareto optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 575-594, November.
    11. Derbel, Bilel & Humeau, Jérémie & Liefooghe, Arnaud & Verel, Sébastien, 2014. "Distributed localized bi-objective search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 731-743.
    12. Sergio Cabello, 2023. "Faster distance-based representative skyline and k-center along pareto front in the plane," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 441-466, June.
    13. Sven Schulz & Udo Buscher & Liji Shen, 2020. "Multi-objective hybrid flow shop scheduling with variable discrete production speed levels and time-of-use energy prices," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(9), pages 1315-1343, November.
    14. Lourdes Uribe & Johan M Bogoya & Andrés Vargas & Adriana Lara & Günter Rudolph & Oliver Schütze, 2020. "A Set Based Newton Method for the Averaged Hausdorff Distance for Multi-Objective Reference Set Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-29, October.
    15. Houssem R. E. H. Bouchekara & Yusuf A. Sha’aban & Mohammad S. Shahriar & Makbul A. M. Ramli & Abdullahi A. Mas’ud, 2023. "Wind Farm Layout Optimization/Expansion with Real Wind Turbines Using a Multi-Objective EA Based on an Enhanced Inverted Generational Distance Metric Combined with the Two-Archive Algorithm 2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-32, January.
    16. Yugong Dang & Hongen Ma & Jun Wang & Zhigang Zhou & Zhidong Xu, 2022. "An Improved Multi-Objective Optimization Decision Method Using NSGA-III for a Bivariate Precision Fertilizer Applicator," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, September.
    17. Taimoor Akhtar & Christine Shoemaker, 2016. "Multi objective optimization of computationally expensive multi-modal functions with RBF surrogates and multi-rule selection," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 17-32, January.
    18. Álvaro Rubio-Largo & Miguel Vega-Rodríguez & David González-Álvarez, 2015. "Multiobjective swarm intelligence for the traffic grooming problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 479-511, March.
    19. Prashant Singh & Ivo Couckuyt & Khairy Elsayed & Dirk Deschrijver & Tom Dhaene, 2017. "Multi-objective Geometry Optimization of a Gas Cyclone Using Triple-Fidelity Co-Kriging Surrogate Models," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 172-193, October.
    20. A. R. Rahimi-Vahed & S. M. Mirghorbani, 2007. "A multi-objective particle swarm for a flow shop scheduling problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 79-102, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:198:y:2009:i:2:p:576-601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.