IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v193y2009i3p649-659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic evolution of economically preferred facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Hochbaum, Dorit S.

Abstract

In a sustained development scenario, it is often the case that an investment is to be made over time in facilities that generate benefits. The benefits result from joint synergies between the facilities expressed as positive utilities specific to some subsets of facilities. As incremental budgets to finance fixed facility costs become available over time, additional facilities can be opened. The question is which facilities should be opened in order to guarantee that the overall benefit return over time is on the highest possible trajectory. This problem is common in situations such as ramping up a communication or transportation network where the facilities are hubs or service stations, or when introducing new technologies such as alternative fuels for cars and the facilities are fueling stations, or when expanding the production capacity with new machines, or when facilities are functions in a developing organization that is forced to make choices of where to invest limited funding. An intuitive strategy frequently used to evolve the set of facilities is a greedy approach that picks additional facilities which provide a highest rate of return on each budget increment. Such strategy is shown to have adverse impact by locking the system into future suboptimal solutions with total benefit that can be arbitrarily small compared to the optimal evolution sequence. It is shown here that the degree of suboptimality of such greedy strategy is extreme in that it can lead to the loss of the majority of future benefits. The main result here is the generation of the entire efficient frontier of optimal solution sets for different budget levels. This frontier contains information that guides the schedule of the optimal evolution of the set of facilities in future expansions. It is demonstrated that the efficient frontier forms a concave envelope, and the configurations on the frontier's breakpoints are nested. The efficient frontier is generated by efficient and strongly polynomial algorithms. For n potential facility locations and for subsets of positive benefits of total size m we find the breakpoints of the efficient frontier using a parametric minimum cut procedure in time , and all N configurations on the efficient frontier in time O(mn log n + N).

Suggested Citation

  • Hochbaum, Dorit S., 2009. "Dynamic evolution of economically preferred facilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 649-659, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:193:y:2009:i:3:p:649-659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(07)01028-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. L. Balinski, 1970. "Notes--On a Selection Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 230-231, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Esposito & Lloyd C. Williams, 2010. "Moving Beyond Human and Organizational Incongruence," Working paper serie RMT - Grenoble Ecole de Management hal-00542258, HAL.
    2. Mark Esposito & Lloyd C. Williams, 2010. "Moving Beyond Human and Organizational Incongruence," Working Papers hal-00542258, HAL.
    3. Ali Koç & David P. Morton, 2015. "Prioritization via Stochastic Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 586-603, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Queyranne, M. & Wolsey, L.A., 2015. "Modeling poset convex subsets," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2015049, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:193:y:2009:i:3:p:649-659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.