IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v465y2022ics0304380021003951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stable coexistence in plant-pollinator-herbivore communities requires balanced mutualistic vs antagonistic interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Yacine, Youssef
  • Loeuille, Nicolas

Abstract

Ecological communities consist of multiple species interacting in diverse ways. Understanding the mechanisms supporting coexistence requires accounting for such a diversity. Because most works focus either on mutualism or predation, how pollination and herbivory interactively determine the stable coexistence in plant-pollinator-herbivore communities is still poorly understood. Studying the typical three-species module of such communities, we determine the conditions allowing stable coexistence then investigate how its maintenance constrains the relative interaction strengths. Our results show that coexistence is possible if pollination is sufficiently strong relative to herbivory, while its stability is possible if herbivory is sufficiently strong relative to pollination. A balance between pollination and herbivory is therefore required. Interestingly, shared preferences for plant phenotypes, that would favor such balance, have been frequently reported in the empirical literature. The identified ecological trade-off between attracting pollinators and deterring herbivores therefore also appears as an emergent property of stable plant-pollinator-herbivore communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yacine, Youssef & Loeuille, Nicolas, 2022. "Stable coexistence in plant-pollinator-herbivore communities requires balanced mutualistic vs antagonistic interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:465:y:2022:i:c:s0304380021003951
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380021003951
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burns, Thomas P. & Rose, Kenneth A. & Brenkert, Antoinette L., 2014. "Quantifying direct and indirect effects of perturbations using model ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 69-80.
    2. Kevin McCann & Alan Hastings & Gary R. Huxel, 1998. "Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature," Nature, Nature, vol. 395(6704), pages 794-798, October.
    3. Anthony D. Barnosky & Nicholas Matzke & Susumu Tomiya & Guinevere O. U. Wogan & Brian Swartz & Tiago B. Quental & Charles Marshall & Jenny L. McGuire & Emily L. Lindsey & Kaitlin C. Maguire & Ben Mers, 2011. "Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?," Nature, Nature, vol. 471(7336), pages 51-57, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. AlAdwani, Mohammad & Saavedra, Serguei, 2022. "Feasibility conditions of ecological models: Unfolding links between model parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunrong Mi & Liang Ma & Mengyuan Yang & Xinhai Li & Shai Meiri & Uri Roll & Oleksandra Oskyrko & Daniel Pincheira-Donoso & Lilly P. Harvey & Daniel Jablonski & Barbod Safaei-Mahroo & Hanyeh Ghaffari , 2023. "Global Protected Areas as refuges for amphibians and reptiles under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Dai, Chuanjun & Zhao, Min & Chen, Lansun, 2012. "Complex dynamic behavior of three-species ecological model with impulse perturbations and seasonal disturbances," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 83-97.
    3. George Van Voorn & Geerten Hengeveld & Jan Verhagen, 2020. "An agent based model representation to assess resilience and efficiency of food supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Dina in ‘t Zandt & Zuzana Kolaříková & Tomáš Cajthaml & Zuzana Münzbergová, 2023. "Plant community stability is associated with a decoupling of prokaryote and fungal soil networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Miehls, Andrea L. Jaeger & Mason, Doran M. & Frank, Kenneth A. & Krause, Ann E. & Peacor, Scott D. & Taylor, William W., 2009. "Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of the Bay of Quinte, Canada, and Oneida Lake, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(22), pages 3182-3193.
    6. Christopher C Wilmers & Wayne M Getz, 2005. "Gray Wolves as Climate Change Buffers in Yellowstone," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(4), pages 1-1, March.
    7. Scotti, Marco & Bondavalli, Cristina & Bodini, Antonio, 2009. "Linking trophic positions and flow structure constraints in ecological networks: Energy transfer efficiency or topology effect?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(21), pages 3070-3080.
    8. Chun-Wei Chang & Takeshi Miki & Hao Ye & Sami Souissi & Rita Adrian & Orlane Anneville & Helen Agasild & Syuhei Ban & Yaron Be’eri-Shlevin & Yin-Ru Chiang & Heidrun Feuchtmayr & Gideon Gal & Satoshi I, 2022. "Causal networks of phytoplankton diversity and biomass are modulated by environmental context," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Hartvig, Martin & Andersen, Ken Haste, 2013. "Coexistence of structured populations with size-based prey selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 24-33.
    10. Torres-Alruiz, Maria Daniela & Rodríguez, Diego J., 2013. "A topo-dynamical perspective to evaluate indirect interactions in trophic webs: New indexes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 363-369.
    11. Perc, Matjaž, 2007. "Effects of small-world connectivity on noise-induced temporal and spatial order in neural media," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 280-291.
    12. Chang, Feng-Hsun & Ke, Po-Ju & Cardinale, Bradley, 2020. "Weak intra-guild predation facilitates consumer coexistence but does not guarantee higher consumer density," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 424(C).
    13. Yan, Chuan & Zhang, Zhibin, 2018. "Dome-shaped transition between positive and negative interactions maintains higher persistence and biomass in more complex ecological networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 14-21.
    14. Wang, Shuran Cindy & Liu, Xueqin & Liu, Yong & Wang, Hongzhu, 2020. "Benthic-pelagic coupling in lake energetic food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 417(C).
    15. Rose, Kenneth A. & Sable, Shaye & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Yurek, Simeon & Trexler, Joel C. & Graf, William & Reed, Denise J., 2015. "Proposed best modeling practices for assessing the effects of ecosystem restoration on fish," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 300(C), pages 12-29.
    16. World Bank, 2021. "Banking on Protected Areas," World Bank Publications - Reports 35737, The World Bank Group.
    17. Zhang, Chongliang & Chen, Yong & Ren, Yiping, 2016. "The efficacy of fisheries closure in rebuilding depleted stocks: Lessons from size-spectrum modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 332(C), pages 59-66.
    18. Md Sayeed Anwar & Dibakar Ghosh & Nikita Frolov, 2021. "Relay Synchronization in a Weighted Triplex Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-10, September.
    19. Rayfield, Bronwyn & Moilanen, Atte & Fortin, Marie-Josée, 2009. "Incorporating consumer–resource spatial interactions in reserve design," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(5), pages 725-733.
    20. Naudé, Wim, 2023. "Melancholy Hues: The Futility of Green Growth and Degrowth, and the Inevitability of Societal Collapse," IZA Discussion Papers 16139, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:465:y:2022:i:c:s0304380021003951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.