IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v437y2020ics0304380020303677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dynamic Energy Budget simulation approach to investigate the eco-physiological factors behind the two-stanza growth of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares)

Author

Listed:
  • Dortel, E.
  • Pecquerie, L.
  • Chassot, E.

Abstract

The growth of yellowfin tuna has been the subject of considerable research efforts since the early 1960s. Most studies support a complex two-stanza growth pattern with a sharp acceleration departing from the von Bertalanffy growth curve used for most fish populations. This growth pattern has been assumed to result from a combination of physiological, ecological and behavioral factors but the role and contribution of each of them have not been addressed yet. We developed a bioenergetic model for yellowfin tuna in the context of Dynamic Energy Budget theory to mechanistically represent the processes governing yellowfin tuna growth. Most parameters of the model were inferred from Pacific bluefin tuna using body-size scaling relationships while some essential parameters were estimated from biological data sets collected in the Indian Ocean. The model proved particularly suitable for reproducing the data collected during the Pacific yellowfin tuna farming experience conducted by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission at the Achotines Laboratory in Panama. In addition, model predictions appeared in agreement with knowledge of the biology and ecology of wild yellowfin tuna. We used our model to explore through simulations two major assumptions that might explain the existence of growth stanzas observed in wild yellowfin tuna: (i) a lower food supply during juvenile stage in relation with high intra- and inter-species competition and (ii) ontogenetic changes in food diet. Our results show that both assumptions are plausible although none of them is self-sufficient to explain the intensity of growth acceleration observed in wild Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna, suggesting that the two factors may act in concert. Our study shows that the yellowfin growth pattern is likely due to behavioral changes triggered by the acquisition of physiological abilities and anatomical traits through ontogeny that result in a major change in intensity of schooling and in a shift in the biotic habitat and trophic ecology of this commercially important tuna species.

Suggested Citation

  • Dortel, E. & Pecquerie, L. & Chassot, E., 2020. "A Dynamic Energy Budget simulation approach to investigate the eco-physiological factors behind the two-stanza growth of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:437:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020303677
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020303677
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pethybridge, H. & Roos, D. & Loizeau, V. & Pecquerie, L. & Bacher, C., 2013. "Responses of European anchovy vital rates and population growth to environmental fluctuations: An individual-based modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 370-383.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chimienti, Marianna & Desforges, Jean-Pierre & Beumer, Larissa T. & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob & van Beest, Floris M. & Schmidt, Niels Martin, 2020. "Energetics as common currency for integrating high resolution activity patterns into dynamic energy budget-individual based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 434(C).
    2. Merel Goedegebuure & Jessica Melbourne-Thomas & Stuart P Corney & Clive R McMahon & Mark A Hindell, 2018. "Modelling southern elephant seals Mirounga leonina using an individual-based model coupled with a dynamic energy budget," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-37, March.
    3. Dambrine, Chloé & Huret, Martin & Woillez, Mathieu & Pecquerie, Laure & Allal, François & Servili, Arianna & de Pontual, Hélène, 2020. "Contribution of a bioenergetics model to investigate the growth and survival of European seabass in the Bay of Biscay – English Channel area," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 423(C).
    4. Boyd, Robin & Roy, Shovonlal & Sibly, Richard & Thorpe, Robert & Hyder, Kieran, 2018. "A general approach to incorporating spatial and temporal variation in individual-based models of fish populations with application to Atlantic mackerel," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 382(C), pages 9-17.
    5. Athanasios Gkanasos & Stylianos Somarakis & Kostas Tsiaras & Dimitrios Kleftogiannis & Marianna Giannoulaki & Eudoxia Schismenou & Sarantis Sofianos & George Triantafyllou, 2019. "Development, application and evaluation of a 1-D full life cycle anchovy and sardine model for the North Aegean Sea (Eastern Mediterranean)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Desforges, Jean-Pierre & Marques, Gonçalo M. & Beumer, Larissa T. & Chimienti, Marianna & Blake, John & Rowell, Janice E. & Adamczewski, Jan & Schmidt, Niels Martin & van Beest, Floris M., 2019. "Quantification of the full lifecycle bioenergetics of a large mammal in the high Arctic," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 27-39.
    7. Gatti, Paul & Petitgas, Pierre & Huret, Martin, 2017. "Comparing biological traits of anchovy and sardine in the Bay of Biscay: A modelling approach with the Dynamic Energy Budget," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 348(C), pages 93-109.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:437:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020303677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.