IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v428y2020ics0304380020301277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The energetic basis of population growth in animal kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M.
  • Lika, Konstadia
  • Augustine, Starrlight
  • Marn, Nina
  • Kooi, Bob W.

Abstract

Population growth, and other population characteristics, have been computed and made available online for over 2000 animal species in the Add-my-Pet (AmP) collection, assuming constant food and temperature environments. The AmP collection – online database of Dynamic Energy Budget model parameters, implied properties and referenced underlying data – provides an unique opportunity to study how energetics of individuals relates to population growth. For the comparisons of traits, we assume that the background hazard rate is zero, but aging applies to all species and ‘thinning’ to species with high reproduction rates. The new concept ‘thinning’ is a state-dependent hazard rate such that the feeding rate of a cohort does not change in time: the increase of individual feeding rates due to growth is exactly compensated by a reduction in numbers. Thinning affects population growth rate, but the impact differs substantially between species. Some 11% of species do not survive thinning, even at abundant food. The population growth rate relates to the underlying energetics; we discuss and suggest explanations for how population growth rates fit into all known patterns in the co-variation of parameter values: body size-scaling, metabolic acceleration, waste-to-hurry, supply-demand spectrum and altricial-precocial spectrum. We show that, after reproduction, age at puberty dominates population growth. The specific population growth rate scales with maximum body weight in the same way as the weight-specific respiration scales with body weight. DEB theory, which explains both, shows, however, that no direct relationship exists between the population growth rate and respiration. We suggest that the similarity in scaling results from the equality between specific population growth and specific growth rate at maximum growth of structure, and might be an evolutionary relict from times that life consisted of dividing unicellulars; population and body growth are directly connected for unicellulars. We show that the specific growth rate at maximum growth equals 1.5 times the von Bertalanffy growth rate, in a DEB context, which is a new interpretation of the latter growth rate. We expected the population growth rate to co-vary with specific somatic maintenance rate, based on a previously discovered pattern, called the waste-to-hurry strategy, where growth and reproduction are increased by simultaneously increasing assimilation and somatic maintenance in species that live off temporarily abundant food supplies. We did find this effect in ecdysozoa and spiralia, which comprise roughly 95% of animal species, but hardly so in tetrapods. The reason might be that specific somatic maintenance also co-varies with specific maturity levels at puberty for tetrapods. The scaled functional response at which the population growth rate is zero is very close to that at which puberty can just be reached in absence of thinning, and somewhat higher in presence of thinning. The specific population growth rate at abundant food correlates negatively with the functional response for which population growth rate is zero. It also correlates negatively with the precociality index, i.e. the ratio of maturity levels at puberty and birth: the more precocial, the larger neonate size, the smaller reproduction rate, especially in restricted taxa such as mammals and cartilaginous fish. Like other traits, the population growth rate shows considerable segregation among taxa, where mammals have a relatively low rate, glires a relatively high rate among mammals, followed by marsupials; afrotherians have the lowest population growth rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M. & Lika, Konstadia & Augustine, Starrlight & Marn, Nina & Kooi, Bob W., 2020. "The energetic basis of population growth in animal kingdom," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:428:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020301277
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020301277
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M., 2020. "The standard dynamic energy budget model has no plausible alternatives," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kooi, B.W. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M., 2020. "A cohort projection method to follow deb-structured populations with periodic, synchronized and iteroparous reproduction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 436(C).
    2. Lika, Konstadia & Augustine, Starrlight & Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M., 2020. "The use of augmented loss functions for estimating dynamic energy budget parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    3. Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M., 2020. "The standard dynamic energy budget model has no plausible alternatives," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    4. Sadoul, Bastien & Geffroy, Benjamin & Lallement, Stephane & Kearney, Michael, 2020. "Multiple working hypotheses for hyperallometric reproduction in fishes under metabolic theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 433(C).
    5. Kooijman, Sebastiaan A.L.M., 2020. "The comparative energetics of petrels and penguins," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 427(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:428:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020301277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.