IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v375y2018icp20-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metapopulation mirages: Problems parsing process from pattern

Author

Listed:
  • Urban, Natasha A.
  • Matter, Stephen F.

Abstract

Ecological models attempting to unite the concepts of biodiversity and biogeography have been used to describe and predict the distribution and abundance of species. Two mechanistic hypotheses, the neutral model and the community-level metapopulation model, have the potential for direct comparison. However, there is potential for incorrectly inferring the underlying mechanisms of observed data if the hypotheses have similar descriptive ability. In this paper, we simulated a range of abiotic island-mainland system and biotic community structure variables following the mechanisms underlying these two hypotheses in order to compare model descriptive ability relative to each other and to a null model. We found that the null and metapopulation models could accurately describe data created under their respective assumptions for many of the simulated system structures. The neutral model generally failed to describe data created under neutral conditions relative to the null model. Modelling also revealed limitations of these mechanistic models identifying conditions where metapopulation dynamics would be inferred but were not occurring, and failing to detect metapopulation dynamics where it was actually occurring. To help alleviate this problem, we also identified sets of conditions where metapopulation dynamics, if it is actually occurring, could be distinguished from null or neutral models. Such systems have moderate variability in distance to mainland, density of mainland species and island area, as well as low to moderate numbers of islands and species (10–50). Simulations demonstrated the potential to distinguish unified models under certain conditions, but there are also conditions where models are equivalent and where the model that best described the data was not consistent with the underlying mechanism. These shortcomings may lead to incorrect conclusions regarding mechanisms presumed to be producing observed patterns in species abundance and distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Urban, Natasha A. & Matter, Stephen F., 2018. "Metapopulation mirages: Problems parsing process from pattern," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 375(C), pages 20-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:375:y:2018:i:c:p:20-29
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.02.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380018300656
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.02.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian J. McGill, 2003. "A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 422(6934), pages 881-885, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Köhler, Peter & Huth, Andreas, 2007. "Impacts of recruitment limitation and canopy disturbance on tropical tree species richness," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 511-517.
    2. Han, Zhi-Quan & Liu, Tong & Zhao, Wen-Xuan & Wang, Han-Yue & Sun, Qin-Ming & Sun, Hui & Li, Bai-Lian, 2022. "A new species abundance distribution model including the hydrological niche differentiation in water-limited ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    3. Kolasa, Jurek & Allen, Craig R. & Sendzimir, Jan & Stow, Craig A., 2012. "Predictions and retrodictions of the hierarchical representation of habitat in heterogeneous environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 199-207.
    4. Yang, Yinghui & Bao, Liping, 2022. "Scale-dependent changes in species richness caused by invader competition," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    5. Tancredi Caruso & Jeff R Powell & Matthias C Rillig, 2012. "Compositional Divergence and Convergence in Local Communities and Spatially Structured Landscapes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-10, April.
    6. Engen, Steinar & Aagaard, Kaare & Bongard, Terje, 2011. "Disentangling the effects of heterogeneity, stochastic dynamics and sampling in a community of aquatic insects," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1387-1393.
    7. Gatti, Roberto Cazzolla & Hordijk, Wim & Kauffman, Stuart, 2017. "Biodiversity is autocatalytic," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 70-76.
    8. Yosef E Maruvka & Nadav M Shnerb, 2009. "Polymorphism Data Can Reveal the Origin of Species Abundance Statistics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-6, April.
    9. Beeravolu, Champak R. & Couteron, Pierre & Pélissier, Raphaël & Munoz, François, 2009. "Studying ecological communities from a neutral standpoint: A review of models’ structure and parameter estimation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(20), pages 2603-2610.
    10. Bhattacharyya, Joydeb & Roelke, Daniel L. & Muhl, Rika M.W. & Withrow, Frances G., 2018. "Exploitative competition of invaders differentially influences the diversity of neutral, lumpy and intransitive phytoplankton assemblages in spatially heterogeneous environments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 59-66.
    11. Edgardo Brigatti & Estevan Augusto Amazonas Mendes, 2021. "Testing macroecological theories in cryptocurrency market: neutral models can not describe diversity patterns and their variation," Papers 2111.02067, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    12. Withrow, Frances G. & Roelke, Daniel L. & Muhl, Rika M.W. & Bhattacharyya, Joydeb, 2018. "Water column processes differentially influence richness and diversity of neutral, lumpy and intransitive phytoplankton assemblages," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 370(C), pages 22-32.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:375:y:2018:i:c:p:20-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.