IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v32y2002i1p91-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dilemmas about Pensions

Author

Listed:
  • Sinclair, Peter

    (Bank of England and University of Birmingham (UK))

Abstract

This paper looks at the general principles underlying pensions systems, and the relative merits of different kinds of system of state superannuation payments. A pay as you go system is, it is argued, usually inferior to a fully funded one. The paper presses the case for the view that redistribution is a cogent argument--perhaps the most cogent argument--for state provision, in a practical context where earnings opportunities differ between individuals. Perfect capital markets are assumed, and labour supplies are endogenous. There is some merit in a uniform state pension supported by a proportional tax on wage earnings, and its implications under two different social welfare functions are considered. But outcomes are Pareto-dominated, under each social welfare function, by a self-selection system from a continuous menu of contribution and pension rates. The least able opt for a large pension and a high tax rate, the abler for less of both. So far from state pensions being proportional to earnings, they should in fact be negatively associated with them.

Suggested Citation

  • Sinclair, Peter, 2002. "Dilemmas about Pensions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 91-105, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:32:y:2002:i:1:p:91-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592602500084
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pay as You Go; Pension;

    JEL classification:

    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:32:y:2002:i:1:p:91-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.