IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v83y2015icp262-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High finite-sample efficiency and robustness based on distance-constrained maximum likelihood

Author

Listed:
  • Maronna, Ricardo A.
  • Yohai, Victor J.

Abstract

Good robust estimators can be tuned to combine a high breakdown point and a specified asymptotic efficiency at a central model. This happens in regression with MM- and τ-estimators among others. However, the finite-sample efficiency of these estimators can be much lower than the asymptotic one. To overcome this drawback, an approach is proposed for parametric models, which is based on a distance between parameters. Given a robust estimator, the proposed one is obtained by maximizing the likelihood under the constraint that the distance is less than a given threshold. For the linear model with normal errors, simulations show that the proposed estimator attains a finite-sample efficiency close to one while improving the robustness of the initial estimator. The same approach also shows good results in the estimation of multivariate location and scatter.

Suggested Citation

  • Maronna, Ricardo A. & Yohai, Victor J., 2015. "High finite-sample efficiency and robustness based on distance-constrained maximum likelihood," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 262-274.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:83:y:2015:i:c:p:262-274
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2014.10.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947314003077
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2014.10.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Howard D. Bondell & Leonard A. Stefanski, 2013. "Efficient Robust Regression via Two-Stage Generalized Empirical Likelihood," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(502), pages 644-655, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alfio Marazzi, 2021. "Improving the Efficiency of Robust Estimators for the Generalized Linear Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Smucler, Ezequiel & Yohai, Victor J., 2017. "Robust and sparse estimators for linear regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 116-130.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfio Marazzi, 2021. "Improving the Efficiency of Robust Estimators for the Generalized Linear Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Masayuki Hirukawa & Mari Sakudo, 2016. "Testing Symmetry of Unknown Densities via Smoothing with the Generalized Gamma Kernels," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Jiang, Depeng & Zhao, Puying & Tang, Niansheng, 2016. "A propensity score adjustment method for regression models with nonignorable missing covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 98-119.
    4. Ronchetti, Elvezio, 2020. "Accurate and robust inference," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 74-88.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:83:y:2015:i:c:p:262-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.