IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v174y2022ics0167947322001177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large-scale local surrogate modeling of stochastic simulation experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Cole, D. Austin
  • Gramacy, Robert B.
  • Ludkovski, Mike

Abstract

Gaussian process (GP) surrogate modeling for large computer experiments is limited by cubic runtimes, especially with data from stochastic simulations with input-dependent noise. A popular workaround to reduce computational complexity involves local approximation (e.g., LAGP). However, LAGP has only been vetted in deterministic settings. A recent variation utilizing inducing points (LIGP) for additional sparsity improves upon LAGP on the speed-vs-accuracy frontier. The authors show that another benefit of LIGP over LAGP is that (local) nugget estimation for stochastic responses is more natural, especially when designs contain substantial replication as is common when attempting to separate signal from noise. Woodbury identities, extended in LIGP from inducing points to replicates, afford efficient computation in terms of unique design locations only. This increases the amount of local data (i.e., the neighborhood size) that may be incorporated without additional flops, thereby enhancing statistical efficiency. Performance of the authors' LIGP upgrades is illustrated on benchmark data and real-world stochastic simulation experiments, including an options pricing control framework. Results indicate that LIGP provides more accurate prediction and uncertainty quantification for varying data dimension and replication strategies versus modern alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Cole, D. Austin & Gramacy, Robert B. & Ludkovski, Mike, 2022. "Large-scale local surrogate modeling of stochastic simulation experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:174:y:2022:i:c:s0167947322001177
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2022.107537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947322001177
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2022.107537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abhirup Datta & Sudipto Banerjee & Andrew O. Finley & Alan E. Gelfand, 2016. "Hierarchical Nearest-Neighbor Gaussian Process Models for Large Geostatistical Datasets," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 800-812, April.
    2. Sudipto Banerjee & Alan E. Gelfand & Andrew O. Finley & Huiyan Sang, 2008. "Gaussian predictive process models for large spatial data sets," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 825-848, September.
    3. Radu Herbei & L. Mark Berliner, 2014. "Estimating Ocean Circulation: An MCMC Approach With Approximated Likelihoods via the Bernoulli Factory," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(507), pages 944-954, September.
    4. L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson, 2006. "Discrete Optimization via Simulation Using COMPASS," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 115-129, February.
    5. Kim, Hyoung-Moon & Mallick, Bani K. & Holmes, C.C., 2005. "Analyzing Nonstationary Spatial Data Using Piecewise Gaussian Processes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 653-668, June.
    6. Gramacy, Robert B., 2016. "laGP: Large-Scale Spatial Modeling via Local Approximate Gaussian Processes in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 72(i01).
    7. Bruce Ankenman & Barry L. Nelson & Jeremy Staum, 2010. "Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 371-382, April.
    8. Gneiting, Tilmann & Raftery, Adrian E., 2007. "Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 359-378, March.
    9. Gramacy, Robert B & Lee, Herbert K. H, 2008. "Bayesian Treed Gaussian Process Models With an Application to Computer Modeling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(483), pages 1119-1130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew J. Heaton & Abhirup Datta & Andrew O. Finley & Reinhard Furrer & Joseph Guinness & Rajarshi Guhaniyogi & Florian Gerber & Robert B. Gramacy & Dorit Hammerling & Matthias Katzfuss & Finn Lindgr, 2019. "A Case Study Competition Among Methods for Analyzing Large Spatial Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(3), pages 398-425, September.
    2. Waley W. J. Liang & Herbert K. H. Lee, 2019. "Bayesian nonstationary Gaussian process models via treed process convolutions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(3), pages 797-818, September.
    3. Monterrubio-Gómez, Karla & Roininen, Lassi & Wade, Sara & Damoulas, Theodoros & Girolami, Mark, 2020. "Posterior inference for sparse hierarchical non-stationary models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Marco H. Benedetti & Veronica J. Berrocal & Naveen N. Narisetty, 2022. "Identifying regions of inhomogeneities in spatial processes via an M‐RA and mixture priors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 798-811, June.
    5. Kelly R. Moran & Matthew W. Wheeler, 2022. "Fast increased fidelity samplers for approximate Bayesian Gaussian process regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1198-1228, September.
    6. Jorge Castillo-Mateo & Miguel Lafuente & Jesús Asín & Ana C. Cebrián & Alan E. Gelfand & Jesús Abaurrea, 2022. "Spatial Modeling of Day-Within-Year Temperature Time Series: An Examination of Daily Maximum Temperatures in Aragón, Spain," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 487-505, September.
    7. Chen, Yewen & Chang, Xiaohui & Luo, Fangzhi & Huang, Hui, 2023. "Additive dynamic models for correcting numerical model outputs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Bledar A. Konomi & Emily L. Kang & Ayat Almomani & Jonathan Hobbs, 2023. "Bayesian Latent Variable Co-kriging Model in Remote Sensing for Quality Flagged Observations," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 28(3), pages 423-441, September.
    9. Bolin, David & Wallin, Jonas & Lindgren, Finn, 2019. "Latent Gaussian random field mixture models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 80-93.
    10. Guhaniyogi, Rajarshi & Banerjee, Sudipto, 2019. "Multivariate spatial meta kriging," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 3-8.
    11. Davis, Casey B. & Hans, Christopher M. & Santner, Thomas J., 2021. "Prediction of non-stationary response functions using a Bayesian composite Gaussian process," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Shinichiro Shirota & Andrew O. Finley & Bruce D. Cook & Sudipto Banerjee, 2023. "Conjugate sparse plus low rank models for efficient Bayesian interpolation of large spatial data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), February.
    13. Xiaotian Zheng & Athanasios Kottas & Bruno Sansó, 2023. "Bayesian geostatistical modeling for discrete‐valued processes," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), November.
    14. Peter A. Gao & Hannah M. Director & Cecilia M. Bitz & Adrian E. Raftery, 2022. "Probabilistic Forecasts of Arctic Sea Ice Thickness," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(2), pages 280-302, June.
    15. Matthias Katzfuss & Joseph Guinness & Wenlong Gong & Daniel Zilber, 2020. "Vecchia Approximations of Gaussian-Process Predictions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 383-414, September.
    16. Ranadeep Daw & Christopher K. Wikle, 2023. "REDS: Random ensemble deep spatial prediction," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), February.
    17. Songhao Wang & Szu Hui Ng & William Benjamin Haskell, 2022. "A Multilevel Simulation Optimization Approach for Quantile Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 569-585, January.
    18. Xuefei Lu & Alessandro Rudi & Emanuele Borgonovo & Lorenzo Rosasco, 2020. "Faster Kriging: Facing High-Dimensional Simulators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 233-249, January.
    19. Erickson, Collin B. & Ankenman, Bruce E. & Sanchez, Susan M., 2018. "Comparison of Gaussian process modeling software," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 179-192.
    20. Marchetti, Yuliya & Nguyen, Hai & Braverman, Amy & Cressie, Noel, 2018. "Spatial data compression via adaptive dispersion clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 138-153.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:174:y:2022:i:c:s0167947322001177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.