IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/crpeac/v93y2023ics1045235423000266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theorizing (and) the future of interdisciplinary accounting research

Author

Listed:
  • Reilley, Jacob
  • Löhlein, Lukas

Abstract

While interdisciplinary accounting research (IAR) is recognized as a polyphonic space for innovation and pluralism, scholars have increasingly expressed unease about the discipline’s future trajectory. This paper focuses the role of theory and how it contributes to stagnation and progress in IAR. To counter stagnation, some have advocated for more theoretical reflection, while other voices call for less emphasis on theory for the sake of pursuing practically relevant research. As young researchers, we reframe this debate by focusing on researchers’ everyday experiences with producing and developing theory. Drawing on a combination of autoethnographic material and interviews, we focus on how researchers ask questions, sort through literature, write and cite, present, and review papers for journals. Through the analysis of these materials, we provide three contributions. First, we highlight where, and through which practices, theoretical stagnation persists. Second, we outline suggestions for changing how we work, which address stagnation in concrete and actionable ways. Third, we propose rethinking theory – not as a process or product, but as a life-long event. We argue that these insights will help us focus on impactful research that emerges with and not despite theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Reilley, Jacob & Löhlein, Lukas, 2023. "Theorizing (and) the future of interdisciplinary accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:93:y:2023:i:c:s1045235423000266
    DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235423000266
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102578?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-06-2014-1735 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Eija Vinnari, 2021. "Animals, Activists and Accounting: On Confronting an Intellectual Dead End," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 194-200, September.
    3. Ahrens, Thomas & Becker, Albrecht & Burns, John & Chapman, Christopher S. & Granlund, Markus & Habersam, Michael & Hansen, Allan & Khalifa, Rihab & Malmi, Teemu & Mennicken, Andrea & Mikes, Anette & P, 2008. "The future of interpretive accounting research—A polyphonic debate," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 840-866.
    4. Zahirul Hoque & Mark A. Covaleski & Tharusha N. Gooneratne, 2013. "Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in research methods in organizational and accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(7), pages 1170-1198, September.
    5. Ingrid Jeacle & Chris Carter, 2014. "Creative spaces in interdisciplinary accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1233-1240, October.
    6. Anthony Hopwood, 2008. "Changing Pressures on the Research Process: On Trying to Research in an Age when Curiosity is not Enough," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 87-96.
    7. Jan A. Pfister & Peeter Peda & David Otley, 2022. "A methodological framework for theoretical explanation in performance management and management control systems research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(2), pages 201-228, March.
    8. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-08-2014-1800 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Power, Michael, 2015. "How accounting begins: object formation and the accretion of infrastructure," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64324, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Kari Lukka & Eija Vinnari, 2014. "Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1308-1338, October.
    11. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-10-2014-1841 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Karl E. Weick, 1998. "Introductory Essay—Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(5), pages 543-555, October.
    13. Michelon, Giovanna, 2021. "Accounting research boundaries, multiple centers and academic empathy," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    14. Raineri, Nicolas, 2015. "Business doctoral education as a liminal period of transition: Comparing theory and practice," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 99-107.
    15. Pimentel, Erica & Cho, Charles & Bothello, Joel, 2022. "The blind spots of interdisciplinarity in addressing grand challenges," MPRA Paper 114562, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Brendan O’Dwyer & Jeffrey Unerman, 2014. "Realizing the potential of interdisciplinarity in accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1227-1232, October.
    17. Yves Gendron, 2008. "Constituting the Academic Performer: The Spectre of Superficiality and Stagnation in Academia," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 97-127.
    18. Chandana Alawattage & Diane-Laure Arjaliès & Mereana Barrett & Julie Bernard & Silvia Pereira de Castro Casa Nova & Charles H. Cho & Christine Cooper & Mercy Denedo & Caecilia Drujon D’Astros & Russel, 2021. "Opening accounting: a Manifesto," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 227-246, July.
    19. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2013-1265 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Kari Lukka & Eija Vinnari, 2014. "Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1308-1338, October.
    21. Hopwood, Anthony G., 2009. "Reflections and projections - and many, many thanks," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 887-894, November.
    22. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-07-2014-1756 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Hopwood, Anthony G., 1987. "The archeology of accounting systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 207-234, April.
    24. Modell, Sven & Vinnari, Eija & Lukka, Kari, 2017. "On the virtues and vices of combining theories: The case of institutional and actor-network theories in accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 62-78.
    25. Gendron, Yves & Rodrigue, Michelle, 2021. "On the centrality of peripheral research and the dangers of tight boundary gatekeeping," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    26. Bebbington, Jan & Russell, Shona & Thomson, Ian, 2017. "Accounting and sustainable development: Reflections and propositions," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-34.
    27. Ingrid Jeacle & Chris Carter, 2014. "Creative spaces in interdisciplinary accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1233-1240, October.
    28. Michel Anteby, 2013. "PERSPECTIVE —Relaxing the Taboo on Telling Our Own Stories: Upholding Professional Distance and Personal Involvement," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1277-1290, August.
    29. Teemu Malmi & Markus Granlund, 2009. "In Search of Management Accounting Theory," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 597-620.
    30. Power, Michael, 2015. "How accounting begins: Object formation and the accretion of infrastructure," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 43-55.
    31. Kari Lukka & Jan Mouritsen, 2002. "Homogeneity or heterogeneity of research in management accounting?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 805-811.
    32. Sven Modell, 2015. "Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in accounting research: a critical realist critique," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(7), pages 1138-1150, September.
    33. Humphrey, Christopher & Gendron, Yves, 2015. "What is going on? The sustainability of accounting academia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 47-66.
    34. Trevor Hopper & Andrew Powell, 1985. "Making Sense Of Research Into The Organizational And Social Aspects Of Management Accounting: A Review Of Its Underlying Assumptions [1]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 429-465, September.
    35. Morales, Jérémy & Sponem, Samuel, 2017. "You too can have a critical perspective! 25 years of Critical Perspectives on Accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 149-166.
    36. Bebbington, Jan & Larrinaga, Carlos, 2014. "Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 395-413.
    37. Brendan O’Dwyer & Jeffrey Unerman, 2014. "Realizing the potential of interdisciplinarity in accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1227-1232, October.
    38. Jérémy Morales & Samuel Sponem, 2017. "You too can have a critical perspective! 25 years of Critical Perspectives on Accounting," Post-Print hal-01479941, HAL.
    39. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570010323047 is not listed on IDEAS
    40. Matthias Wenzel & Jochen Koch, 2018. "From entity to process: toward more process-based theorizing in the field of organizational change," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 80-98, March.
    41. Sven Modell, 2015. "Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in accounting research: a critical realist critique," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(7), pages 1138-1150, September.
    42. Power, Michael, 2013. "Theory and theorization: A comment on Laughlin and Habermas," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 225-227.
    43. James Guthrie & Lee D. Parker, 2011. "Reflections and projections: 25 years of interdisciplinary perspectives on accounting, auditing and accountability research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(1), pages 6-26, December.
    44. Timothy J. Fogarty, 2014. "A dream deferred: interdisciplinary accounting in the US," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1265-1270, October.
    45. Eva Boxenbaum & Linda Rouleau, 2011. "New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and scripts in organizational theory," Post-Print hal-00719599, HAL.
    46. Timothy J. Fogarty, 2014. "A dream deferred: interdisciplinary accounting in the US," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1265-1270, October.
    47. Malsch, Bertrand & Tessier, Sophie, 2015. "Journal ranking effects on junior academics: Identity fragmentation and politicization," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 84-98.
    48. Paolo Quattrone, 2000. "Constructivism and accounting research: towards a trans‐disciplinary perspective," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 130-155, May.
    49. Paolo Quattrone, 2009. "'We have never been Post-modern': On the Search of Management Accounting Theory," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 621-630.
    50. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-may-2012-01024 is not listed on IDEAS
    51. Zahirul Hoque & Mark A. Covaleski & Tharusha N. Gooneratne, 2013. "Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in research methods in organizational and accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(7), pages 1170-1198, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pimentel, Erica & Cho, Charles & Bothello, Joel, 2022. "The blind spots of interdisciplinarity in addressing grand challenges," MPRA Paper 114562, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Gendron, Yves & Rodrigue, Michelle, 2021. "On the centrality of peripheral research and the dangers of tight boundary gatekeeping," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Pimentel, Erica & Cho, Charles H. & Bothello, Joel, 2023. "The blind spots of interdisciplinarity in addressing grand challenges," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Endenich, Christoph & Trapp, Rouven, 2018. "Signaling effects of scholarly profiles – The editorial teams of North American accounting association journals," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 4-23.
    5. Lukka, Kari & Becker, Albrecht, 2023. "The future of critical interdisciplinary accounting research: Performative ontology and critical interventionist research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Bamber, Matthew & Tekathen, Matthäus, 2023. "Beyond the pages of the ‘how-to’ textbook: A study of the lived experiences of the accounting ethnographer," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    7. Fox, Kenneth A., 2018. "The manufacture of the academic accountant," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-20.
    8. Modell, Sven & Vinnari, Eija & Lukka, Kari, 2017. "On the virtues and vices of combining theories: The case of institutional and actor-network theories in accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 62-78.
    9. Maran, Laura & Bigoni, Michele & Morrison, Leanne, 2023. "Shedding light on alternative interdisciplinary accounting research through journal editors’ perspectives and an analysis of recent publications," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Verdier, Marie-Anne & Boutant Lapeyre, Jennifer, 2023. "The myth of workforce reduction efficiency: The performativity of accounting language," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Gendron, Yves, 2018. "On the elusive nature of critical (accounting) research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-12.
    12. Khosa, Amrinder & Burch, Steven & Ozdil, Esin & Wilkin, Carla, 2020. "Current issues in PhD supervision of accounting and finance students: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    13. Palea, Vera, 2015. "Journal Rankings and the Sustainability of Diversity in Accounting Research," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201546, University of Turin.
    14. Palea, Vera, 2017. "Whither accounting research? A European view," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 59-73.
    15. Argento, Daniela & van Helden, Jan, 2023. "Are public sector accounting researchers going through an identity shift due to the increasing importance of journal rankings?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    16. Stacchezzini, Riccardo & Masiero, Eleonora & Lai, Alessandro, 2023. "Histories as counter-accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Gebreiter, Florian, 2022. "A profession in peril? University corporatization, performance measurement and the sustainability of accounting academia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    18. Goncharenko, Galina, 2023. "In the spotlight: Rethinking NGO accountability in the #MeToo era," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. O'Dwyer, Brendan & Unerman, Jeffrey, 2016. "Fostering rigour in accounting for social sustainability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 32-40.
    20. Hussain, Simon & Liu, Lana Yan Jun & Miller, Anthony D., 2020. "Accounting as a dichotomised discipline: An analysis of the source materials used in the construction of accounting articles," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:93:y:2023:i:c:s1045235423000266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/critical-perspectives-on-accounting/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.