IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v56y2013i2p159-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protecting your brand against the heartbreak of genericide

Author

Listed:
  • Walsh, Michael G.

Abstract

Most brands, or trademarks, have considerable value, sometimes in the billions of dollars. Trademarks protect entrepreneurial success and help prevent confusion among consumers. Trademarks can be lost through a process known as ‘genericide.’Genericide occurs when the trademark holder does not closely monitor unauthorized use of the brand. The holder then loses the right to the exclusive use of the trademark. More often than not, financial disaster ensues. Ironically, the trademarked goods and services most at risk of genericide are those with the greatest popularity and market share. Fortunately, however, many weapons exist to prevent genericide, including selecting a distinctive, non-generic name when introducing the product; monitoring employees’ and advertisers’ use of the trademark; keeping track of how competitors and others use the trademark; and thinking carefully before licensing the trademark. Trademark holders should assign the highest priority to monitoring intentional and negligent actions by in-house employees, competitors, and third parties to prevent the heartbreak and devastating consequences of genericide.

Suggested Citation

  • Walsh, Michael G., 2013. "Protecting your brand against the heartbreak of genericide," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 159-166.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:56:y:2013:i:2:p:159-166
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2012.11.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681312001589
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.11.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Cova & Simona D'Antone, 2016. "Brand Iconicity vs. Anti-Consumption Well-Being Concerns: The Nutella Palm Oil Conflict," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 166-192, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:56:y:2013:i:2:p:159-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.