IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v37y2005i4p443-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management accounting and accountability in a new reality of everyday life

Author

Listed:
  • Vamosi, T.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the concept ‘accountability’. Individuality and accountability is discussed against the background of management accounting in a privatised company in transition from command to market economy. With Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T., 1966. The social construction of reality. A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, New York, Doubleday/Anchor, the accountability concept is presented as a translation and interpretation of an institutional arrangement with a given logic or rationality. Based on a case study, the paper shows that changing views on accountability support the institutionalisation processes, constituting the case company as a market economy actor in which there is a ‘struggle’ between different rationale views (the market economy, social accountability and production-oriented views). The analysis explicates various ways in which these matters relate to the new way of talking about the company and its survival under market economy conditions—a struggle that management accounting must take into account particularly in the way it deals with the consequences of individual action.

Suggested Citation

  • Vamosi, T., 2005. "Management accounting and accountability in a new reality of everyday life," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 443-470.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:37:y:2005:i:4:p:443-470
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2005.07.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838905000569
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2005.07.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Brownell, Peter, 1999. "The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 189-204, April.
    2. Gierszewska, Grayna & Romanowska, Maria, 1992. "Remodelling Polish enterprise," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 181-191, September.
    3. Zahirul Hoque & Manzurul Alam, 1999. "TQM adoption, institutionalism and changes in management accounting systems: a case study," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 199-210.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. I Gede Sanica & Luh Putu Wiagustini & I.B Panji Sedana & Ni Luh Gede Sri Artini, 2019. "Internalization of Intrinsic Value of Trust in Financial Accountability: A Study of Subak Jatiluwih Bali Indonesia," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 99-109, January.
    2. Weetman, Pauline, 2006. "Discovering the ‘international’ in accounting and finance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 351-370.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasilii Erokhin & Dmitry Endovitsky & Alexey Bobryshev & Natalia Kulagina & Anna Ivolga, 2019. "Management Accounting Change as a Sustainable Economic Development Strategy during Pre-Recession and Recession Periods: Evidence from Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Lepori, Benedetto & Montauti, Martina, 2020. "Bringing the organization back in: Flexing structural responses to competing logics in budgeting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Ilenia Ascani & Marco Gatti & Maria Serena Chiucchi, 2021. "Pandemia e sistema di budgeting: quali effetti sulla figura del controller?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(3), pages 65-86.
    5. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G. & Wakefield, James, 2016. "Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-17.
    6. Fabienne Villesèque-Dubus, 2005. "Vers une transversalisation des budgets : un essai d'observation et d'interprétation," Post-Print halshs-00483762, HAL.
    7. Rodney Coyte & Martin Messner & Shan Zhou, 2022. "The revival of zero‐based budgeting: drivers and consequences of firm‐level adoptions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3147-3188, September.
    8. Mostafa Kamal Hassan, 2008. "The development of accounting regulations in Egypt: Legitimating the International Accounting Standards," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(5), pages 467-484, May.
    9. Claire Dambrin & Hélène Löning, 2008. "R.Simons, un piagétien qui s'ignore ? Systèmes de contrôle interactifs et processus de formation de l'intelligence et d'accès à la connaissance," Post-Print halshs-00522503, HAL.
    10. Chenhall, Robert H. & Moers, Frank, 2015. "The role of innovation in the evolution of management accounting and its integration into management control," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Anderson, Shannon W. & Nair, Sujay & Jiang, Yile (Anson), 2021. "Manager ‘growth mindset’ and resource management practices," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Christophe Herriau & Lionel Touchais, 2012. "Changement et système de contrôle : une perspective dynamique," Post-Print hal-03135230, HAL.
    13. Cuguero, Natalia & Rosanas, Josep M., 2011. "The next generation of management control systems: Justice and fairness as antecedents for goal congruence," IESE Research Papers D/917, IESE Business School.
    14. Luv Sharma & Aravind Chandrasekaran & Elliot Bendoly, 2020. "Does the Office of Patient Experience Matter in Improving Delivery of Care?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 833-855, April.
    15. Dunk, Alan S., 2007. "Innovation budget pressure, quality of IS information, and departmental performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 115-124.
    16. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 301-315, April.
    17. Erkki K. Laitinen & Aapo Länsiluoto & Soila Salonen, 2016. "Interactive budgeting, product innovation, and firm performance: empirical evidence from Finnish firms," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 293-322, November.
    18. Sheehan Rahman & Jashim Uddin Ahmed, 2012. "An Evaluation of the Changing Role of Management Accountants in Recent Years," Indus Journal of Management & Social Science (IJMSS), Department of Business Administration, vol. 6(1), pages 18-30, January.
    19. Naranjo-Gil, David & Hartmann, Frank, 2007. "Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(7-8), pages 735-756.
    20. Nuraddeen Abubakar Nuhu & Kevin Baird & Sophia Su, 2023. "The impact of interactive and diagnostic levers of eco‐control on eco‐innovation: The mediating role of employee environmental citizenship behaviour," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2245-2271, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:37:y:2005:i:4:p:443-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.