IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v392y2021ics0096300320306512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coevolution of spatial ultimatum game and link weight promotes fairness

Author

Listed:
  • Deng, Lili
  • Zhang, Xingxing
  • Wang, Cheng

Abstract

In real life, individuals have the capacity to adjust their social relationships on network according to the feedback of their communication. Based on this fact, we present a coevolutionary ultimatum game model to explore the role of dynamic interaction on fairness, in which the link weight is introduced to represent the strength of the social relationship and the link weight is dynamically updated by comparing payoff received via the interaction with the weighted average utility. We mainly analyze the effects of link weight boundary control parameter and link weight adjustment amplitude on the evolution of fairness. Through Monte Carlo simulations, we find that the coevolutionary mechanism of game strategy and link weight can promote the emergence of fairness. More specifically, the fairness is strikingly promoted with the increase of the link weight boundary control parameter, while the influence of link weight adjustment amplitude is not so significant. Moreover, the introduction of this coevolutionary mechanism results in heterogeneous link weight distribution, and the larger link weight boundary control parameter can generate a higher network heterogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Deng, Lili & Zhang, Xingxing & Wang, Cheng, 2021. "Coevolution of spatial ultimatum game and link weight promotes fairness," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:392:y:2021:i:c:s0096300320306512
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300320306512
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shu, Feng & Li, Min & Liu, Xingwen, 2019. "Memory mechanism with weighting promotes cooperation in the evolutionary games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 17-24.
    2. Tanimoto, Jun, 2009. "Promotion of cooperation through co-evolution of networks and strategy in a 2 × 2 game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(6), pages 953-960.
    3. Wang, Lu & Ye, Shun-qiang & Jones, Michael C. & Ye, Ye & Wang, Meng & Xie, Neng-gang, 2015. "The evolutionary analysis of the ultimatum game based on the net-profit decision," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 430(C), pages 32-38.
    4. Deng, Lili & Tang, Wansheng & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2011. "The coevolutionary ultimatum game on different network topologies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4227-4235.
    5. Huang, Keke & Liu, Yishun & Zhang, Yichi & Yang, Chunhua & Wang, Zhen, 2018. "Understanding cooperative behavior of agents with heterogeneous perceptions in dynamic networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 234-240.
    6. Liu, Jinzhuo & Meng, Haoran & Wang, Wei & Xie, Zhongwen & Yu, Qian, 2019. "Evolution of cooperation on independent networks: The influence of asymmetric information sharing updating mechanism," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 234-241.
    7. Zhang, Yanling & Chen, Xiaojie & Liu, Aizhi & Sun, Changyin, 2018. "The effect of the stake size on the evolution of fairness," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 321(C), pages 641-653.
    8. Chen, Ya-Shan & Yang, Han-Xin & Guo, Wen-Zhong & Liu, Geng-Geng, 2018. "Prisoner’s dilemma game on reputation-based weighted network," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 64-68.
    9. Miyaji, Kohei & Wang, Zhen & Tanimoto, Jun & Hagishima, Aya & Kokubo, Satoshi, 2013. "The evolution of fairness in the coevolutionary ultimatum games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 13-18.
    10. Guo, Hao & Chu, Chen & Shen, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2018. "Reputation-based coevolution of link weights promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 265-268.
    11. Geng, Yini & Shen, Chen & Hu, Kaipeng & Shi, Lei, 2018. "Impact of punishment on the evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 540-545.
    12. Lei, Chuang & Wu, Te & Jia, Jian-Yuan & Cong, Rui & Wang, Long, 2010. "Heterogeneity of allocation promotes cooperation in public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(21), pages 4708-4714.
    13. Ye, Wenxing & Feng, Weiying & Lü, Chen & Fan, Suohai, 2017. "Memory-based prisoner’s dilemma game with conditional selection on networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 307(C), pages 31-37.
    14. Zhi-Qin Ma & Cheng-Yi Xia & Shi-Wen Sun & Li Wang & Huai-Bin Wang & Juan Wang, 2011. "Heterogeneous Link Weight Promotes The Cooperation In Spatial Prisoner'S Dilemma," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(11), pages 1257-1268.
    15. Jun Tanimoto, 2011. "A Study Of A Quadruple Co-Evolutionary Model And Its Reciprocity Phase For Various Prisoner'S Dilemma Game," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 401-417.
    16. Li, Xiaopeng & Sun, Shiwen & Xia, Chengyi, 2019. "Reputation-based adaptive adjustment of link weight among individuals promotes the cooperation in spatial social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 810-820.
    17. Francisco C Santos & Jorge M Pacheco & Tom Lenaerts, 2006. "Cooperation Prevails When Individuals Adjust Their Social Ties," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(10), pages 1-8, October.
    18. Ernst Fehr & Urs Fischbacher, 2003. "The nature of human altruism," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6960), pages 785-791, October.
    19. Iwata, Manabu & Akiyama, Eizo, 2016. "Heterogeneity of link weight and the evolution of cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 448(C), pages 224-234.
    20. Bo, Xianyu & Yang, Jianmei, 2010. "Evolutionary ultimatum game on complex networks under incomplete information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(5), pages 1115-1123.
    21. Deng, Lili & Lin, Ying & Wang, Cheng & Xu, Ronghua & Zhou, Gengui, 2020. "Effects of coupling strength and coupling schemes between interdependent lattices on the evolutionary ultimatum game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    22. Hessel Oosterbeek & Randolph Sloof & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2004. "Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 171-188, June.
    23. Chu, Chen & Liu, Jinzhuo & Shen, Chen & Jin, Jiahua & Tang, Yunxuan & Shi, Lei, 2017. "Coevolution of game strategy and link weight promotes cooperation in structured population," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 28-32.
    24. Du, Jinming, 2019. "Redistribution promotes cooperation in spatial public goods games under aspiration dynamics," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 1-1.
    25. M. N. Kuperman & S. Risau-Gusman, 2008. "The effect of the topology on the spatial ultimatum game," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 62(2), pages 233-238, March.
    26. Nagashima, Keisuke & Tanimoto, Jun, 2019. "A stochastic Pairwise Fermi rule modified by utilizing the average in payoff differences of neighbors leads to increased network reciprocity in spatial prisoner's dilemma games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 661-669.
    27. Cardinot, Marcos & Griffith, Josephine & O’Riordan, Colm, 2018. "A further analysis of the role of heterogeneity in coevolutionary spatial games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 493(C), pages 116-124.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Yakun & Xiong, Tianyu & Zheng, Lei & Li, Yumeng & Chen, Xiaojie, 2020. "The effect of similarity on the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Yang, Zhihu & Li, Zhi & Wang, Long, 2020. "Evolution of cooperation in a conformity-driven evolving dynamic social network," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 379(C).
    3. Du, Jinming & Wu, Ziren, 2023. "Coevolutionary dynamics of strategy and network structure with publicity mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 623(C).
    4. Song, Qun & Cao, Zhaoheng & Tao, Rui & Jiang, Wei & Liu, Chen & Liu, Jinzhuo, 2020. "Conditional neutral punishment promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    5. Zheng, Lei & Li, Youqi & Zhou, Jingsai & Li, Yumeng, 2022. "The effect of celebrity on the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    6. Deng, Lili & Tang, Wansheng & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2011. "The coevolutionary ultimatum game on different network topologies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4227-4235.
    7. Gao, Hongyu & Wang, Juan & Zhang, Fan & Li, Xiaopeng & Xia, Chengyi, 2021. "Cooperation dynamics based on reputation in the mixed population with two species of strategists," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 410(C).
    8. Pan, Qiuhui & Wang, Linpeng & He, Mingfeng, 2020. "Social dilemma based on reputation and successive behavior," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    9. Takesue, Hirofumi, 2019. "Effects of updating rules on the coevolving prisoner’s dilemma," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 399-408.
    10. Liu, Chengwei & Wang, Juan & Li, Xiaopeng & Xia, Chengyi, 2020. "The link weight adjustment considering historical strategy promotes the cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 554(C).
    11. Han, Weiwei & Zhang, Zhipeng & Sun, Junqing & Xia, Chengyi, 2022. "Role of reputation constraints in the spatial public goods game with second-order reputation evaluation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Takesue, Hirofumi, 2021. "Symmetry breaking in the prisoner’s dilemma on two-layer dynamic multiplex networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    13. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Reputation evaluation with tolerance and reputation-dependent imitation on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    14. Zhu, Peican & Wang, Xiaoyu & Jia, Danyang & Guo, Yangming & Li, Shudong & Chu, Chen, 2020. "Investigating the co-evolution of node reputation and edge-strategy in prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
    15. Mao, Fubing & Ma, Lijia & He, Qiang & Xiao, Gaoxi, 2020. "Match making in complex social networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    16. Fabian Dvorak & Regina Stumpf & Sebastian Fehrler & Urs Fischbacher, 2024. "Generative AI Triggers Welfare-Reducing Decisions in Humans," Papers 2401.12773, arXiv.org.
    17. Jaime Iranzo & Luis M Floría & Yamir Moreno & Angel Sánchez, 2012. "Empathy Emerges Spontaneously in the Ultimatum Game: Small Groups and Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    18. Yu, Fengyuan & Wang, Jianwei & Chen, Wei & He, Jialu, 2023. "Increased cooperation potential and risk under suppressed strategy differentiation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 621(C).
    19. Dietrich, Stephan & Beekman, Gonne & Nillesen, Eleonora, 2018. "Market integration and pro-social behaviour in rural Liberia," MERIT Working Papers 2018-010, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    20. Sun, Jiaqin & Fan, Ruguo & Luo, Ming & Zhang, Yingqing & Dong, Lili, 2018. "The evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with dynamic relationship-based preferential learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 598-611.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:392:y:2021:i:c:s0096300320306512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.