IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v267y2015icp3-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of deterministic and probabilistic approaches to identify the dynamic moving load and damages of a reinforced concrete beam

Author

Listed:
  • Waeytens, Julien
  • Rosić, Bojana

Abstract

Two classical civil engineering inverse problems are considered. The first deals with the determination of dynamic moving loads applied to a reinforced concrete beam. The second one corresponds to the monitoring and the damage assessment. The concrete damage due to overloading is modeled by a loss of the concrete Young’ modulus, whereas the steel bar damage due to corrosion effects is modeled by a reduction of the steel bar cross section. To identify the loading and damage parameters, deterministic and probabilistic model updating techniques are applied and compared. In the deterministic approach, a gradient descent technique based on the adjoint framework is used to minimize the data misfit functional with a Tikhonov regularization term. Then, a regularization by a means of Bayes’s rule is considered in a probabilistic approach. The estimation is of the minimum variance type achieved with the help of the transformed ensemble Kalman filter.

Suggested Citation

  • Waeytens, Julien & Rosić, Bojana, 2015. "Comparison of deterministic and probabilistic approaches to identify the dynamic moving load and damages of a reinforced concrete beam," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 267(C), pages 3-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:267:y:2015:i:c:p:3-16
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2015.07.121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300315011182
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2015.07.121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:267:y:2015:i:c:p:3-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.