IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/edt/aucspp/v45y2023i2p22-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University Chatgpt: Friend Or Foe?

Author

Listed:
  • Leila BELKAIM

    (, Faculty of Letters and Foreign Languages, Ibn Khaldoun Tiaret University, Algeria)

Abstract

In this article, we highlight the key tool called “ChatGPT". In the era of artificial intelligence and the digitalization of education, the university teacher must innovate his teaching practices in front of the GPT Chat which is talked about too much. And this, to give its students quality teaching practices and adapt to the requirements of the software. As a result, getting started with the ChatGPT tool has a significant impact on the development of teachers' digital skills. This allows them to take charge of their own teaching in terms of needs, commitment and professional rhythm. However, the ChatGPT tool is currently a sublimation and a rejection or even a commotion for the university teacher and the rest of the world. In the teaching sector the debate is divided between ethics and anethics, therefore, is the teacher able to detect plagiarism and similarity in the answers of his students? For the sake of academic integrity, teachers should find smart and rational learning assessment solutions to block all possibilities of plagiarism with ChatGPT. Our objective is to show how the evaluation of work in higher education is done under the effect of the ChatGPT challenge. The mobilization of quantitative and qualitative methods in our research will provide us with conclusive answers to the question of the new challenges of correcting student evaluations in the context of ChatGPT.

Suggested Citation

  • Leila BELKAIM, 2023. "University Chatgpt: Friend Or Foe?," Annals of the University of Craiova, Series Psychology, Pedagogy, Teacher Training Department, University of Craiova, vol. 45(2), pages 22-30, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:edt:aucspp:v:45:y:2023:i:2:p:22-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://aucpp.ro/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2.-BELKAIM_AUC_PP_2023_no_45_issue_2_pp_22-30.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    GPT chat; Artificial intelligence; Teaching/learning; Ethics; Anethical.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edt:aucspp:v:45:y:2023:i:2:p:22-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan Valeriu Voinea (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/DPPD/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.