IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/edt/aucspp/v40y2019i2p111-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Analysis Of Documentation Sources €“ A Challenge For Teachers?

Author

Listed:
  • Florentin – Remus MOGONEA

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

The consultation of the sources with a view to writing a scientific paper and carrying out research represents an essential condition and stage, securing a successful activity, which meets the rigour and requirements of such an endeavour. Information mining or documentation itself is subject to requirements and rigour which must, on the one hand, ensure an adequate selection of the sources and, on the other hand, an appropriate use of them. Lately, the volume, but also the diversity of these sources, have made this approach difficult. The difficulty is also increased by the need to carry out critical analyzes of the consulted works, which identify the successful and less successful aspects, resolved ones, or of the previous experiences. For teachers conducting research and writing scientific papers, this can be a serious challenge. The present study aims to investigate the necessity and possibility of a critical analysis of the bibliographic sources by the teachers who undertake investigative approaches. The sample of subjects on which the investigation was carried out consisted of 120 school-based teachers, of different specializations, in pre-university education, who sat in for the examination for the first teaching degree at the University of Craiova in the session of February 2019. The research method used was the questionnaire-based survey, the research tool being an opinion questionnaire. The results of the investigation highlighted the importance of the critical analysis of the documentation sources by the teachers who carry out theoretical or experimental research.

Suggested Citation

  • Florentin – Remus MOGONEA, 2019. "Critical Analysis Of Documentation Sources €“ A Challenge For Teachers?," Annals of the University of Craiova, Series Psychology, Pedagogy, Teacher Training Department, University of Craiova, vol. 40(2), pages 111-122, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:edt:aucspp:v:40:y:2019:i:2:p:111-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://aucpp.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/D_AUC_PP_no_40_Mogonea_FR_pp.-111-122.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Critical analysis; Documentation sources; Webography; Bibliography; Plagiarism.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edt:aucspp:v:40:y:2019:i:2:p:111-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan Valeriu Voinea (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/DPPD/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.