IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/edt/aucjcm/v5y2019i1p33-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applied Ethics: The Controversies On Abortion

Author

Listed:
  • Abebe BIRU

    (Department of Civics and Ethics Studies, Jimma University, Ethiopia)

  • Abtewold MOGES

    (Department of Civics and Ethics Studies, Jimma University, Ethiopia)

Abstract

This paper attempts to explore the nature of controversial applied issues chiefly it deals with abortion. The author presents the overall of what are the major parts of moral philosophy and a great emphasizes is given to applied ethics. Within this short and precise work dear you will identify those arguments which are against and in favor of abortion. Pro-life and pro-choice abortionist arguments are assessed extensively which pinpoints permissibility or impossibility of abortion. How the dispute of abortion associated with political outlooks was assessed in connection to prominent groups of abortion. A pregnant woman also aborts a fetus because of socio-economic matters and does it is permissible or impossible in light of morality. Finally, the author conclude by identifying those exceptional cases that allow abortion, in favor of Thomson view and Warren conception of fetus as denial of fact is explored deeply.

Suggested Citation

  • Abebe BIRU & Abtewold MOGES, 2019. "Applied Ethics: The Controversies On Abortion," Annals of the University of Craiova for Journalism, Communication and Management, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 5(1), pages 33-45, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:edt:aucjcm:v:5:y:2019:i:1:p:33-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.aucjc.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/aucjcm-vol-5-2019-33-45.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Applied Ethics abortion; fetus; miscarriage; induced abortion; pro-life and liberalism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edt:aucjcm:v:5:y:2019:i:1:p:33-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan Valeriu Voinea (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/litere/cadr_juridic/departament_comunicare_jurnalism_stiinte_ale_educatiei/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.