IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2017-04-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Relationship between Expectations Gap from Attitude of Accreditation of Audit Report by Credit Experts and Non-repayment of Granted Facilities in the Branches of Keshavarzi Bank of Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Saeid Ebrahimipour Farasangi

    (Department of Accounting, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran)

  • Amirhossein Taebi Noghondari

    (Department of Accounting, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between expectations gap from attitude of accreditation of audit report by credit experts and non-repayment of granted facilities in the branches of Keshavarzi Bank of Iran. Considering that collection of debts shows the bank's position in society and the banking network and improve performance of management. Credit officers and experts of banks repeatedly for authentication to borrowers with accuracy in audit reports specially type of comment provided act to the credit assessment of the economic unites of applicant of facilities. The withdrawal of auditors from the accreditation role of independent auditors and withdrawal of users has a significant difference which provide assessments with different aspects to meet the expectations gap from it and in such a situation, experts and officials of credit part of the banks cannot resolve their critical task from society's expectations and this in turn will cause impact on the bank's claims. Results of the survey research are based on results of collecting 250 questionnaires from decision-makers and officials of paying credits in the banking system. In this regard, it is tried to measure this relation by using statistics and data collected in time period 2015. In this study, linear regression is used at 95% confidence level, according to the results, it was specified by increasing expectations gap from attitude of accreditation of audit report by credit experts, non-repayment of granted facilities increases that shows the direct relationship between the two variables. So a systematic and comprehensive program to be designed and implemented to reduce expectation gap from audit report by credit experts so that the ability to analyze audit report and financial statements related to report and correct understanding of the applicant's financial and credit position of facilities to be provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeid Ebrahimipour Farasangi & Amirhossein Taebi Noghondari, 2017. "Investigating the Relationship between Expectations Gap from Attitude of Accreditation of Audit Report by Credit Experts and Non-repayment of Granted Facilities in the Branches of Keshavarzi Bank of I," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(4), pages 199-206.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2017-04-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/5182/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/5182/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Olojede & Olayinka Erin & Osariemen Asiriuwa & Momoh Usman, 2020. "Audit expectation gap: an empirical analysis," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Attitude of Accreditation; Expectations Gap from Audit Report; Credit Experts; Granted Facilities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2017-04-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.