IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2017-04-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mutual Funds Performance: Conventional and Sharia Product

Author

Listed:
  • M. Agussalim

    (Lecturer of Economic and Business Faculty, Eka Sakti University, Padang Indonesia,)

  • Nandan Limakrisna

    (Lecturer of Economic and Business Faculty, YAI Persada Indonesia University, Jakarta Indonesia)

  • Hapzi Ali

    (Lecturer of Economic and Business Faculty, Mercu Buana University, Jakarta Indonesia)

Abstract

Mutual fund investment is one of the instruments that are being developed, with the advent of the Indonesian capital market. In progress, mutual the first apply the principle of Sharia in running strategy business and be an option investors to invest. A fundamental difference between a mutual fund conventional with mutual funds Sharia at investment policy. A mutual fund Sharia use investment policy through selection process in the formation of portfolio and strategies management using the principle Islamic. This study aims to see how performance between a mutual fund conventional and Sharia. Sample used in this research is a stock mutual fund conventional and Islamic products. Data used in the form of secondary data net assets value per Unit (NAV/unit), composite index (IHSG), Jakarta Islamic Index and a data rate of Sertifikat Bank Indonesia (SBI) and SBI Syariah the period 2007-2014. The mutual fund performance seen of its rate of return and risk as well as the measurement method using the Sharpe index, Treynor index and Jensen's Alpha. The tools used statistical test is ver.21 with SPSS statistical methods test the hypothesis testing independent sample t-test. Research results with the alpha (?) 5% showed no difference in performance between conventional and Sharia mutual funds seen from the level of risk and Sharpe index method. While the rate of return and the measurement method also Treynor Index Jensen Alpha, the research results with the alpha (?) of 5% in a given year shows there is a difference in performance between conventional and Sharia mutual funds in the study period of 2007-2014. The results show the performance of mutual funds conventional better than Sharia mutual funds seen from the level of return and the Sharpe index. When viewed from the level of risk, Treynor index and Jensen's Alpha results show the performance of conventional mutual funds is lower than the Sharia mutual fund.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Agussalim & Nandan Limakrisna & Hapzi Ali, 2017. "Mutual Funds Performance: Conventional and Sharia Product," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(4), pages 150-156.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2017-04-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/5085/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/5085/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad, Shabbir & Alsharif, Danyah, 2019. "A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Islamic and Conventional Mutual Funds in Saudi Arabia," MPRA Paper 94808, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Jelena Stankevičienė & Ieva Petronienė, 2019. "Bond Mutual Funds vs. Bond Exchange Traded Funds: Evaluation of Risk Adjusted Performance," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Conventional Mutual Funds Performance; Sharia Mutual Fund Performance; Return; Risk; Sharpe Index; Treynor Index; Jensen's Alpha;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2017-04-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.