This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Profit Sharing and Productivity: Microeconomic Evidence from the United States

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Kruse, Douglas L
Abstract

Profit sharing has often been suggested as a potential solution to principal/agent problems in the workplace. The relationship between productivity and profit sharing is examined using a panel dataset drawn from 2,976 publicly-held companies over the 1971-85 period. Alternatively using firm-intercept and first-difference specifications, the regression results indicate that the adoption of profit sharing is associated with a 2.5-4.2 percent increase in productivity. In addition, the size of the effect increases with the proportion of employees participating in profit sharing. These results hold under a variety of specifications and do not appear to be explained by accompanying changes in management or personnel policies. Copyright 1992 by Royal Economic Society.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%28199201%29102%3A410%3C24%3APSAPME%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23&origin=bc
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Royal Economic Society in its journal The Economic Journal.

Volume (Year): 102 (1992)
Issue (Month): 410 (January)
Pages: 24-36
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:102:y:1992:i:410:p:24-36

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.res.org.uk/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Web: http://www.blackwellpublishers.co.uk/asp/journal.asp?ref=0013-0133

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Antti Kauhanen & Hannu Piekkola, 2004. "What Makes Performance-related Pay Schemes Work? Finnish Evidence," Discussion Papers 929, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy. [Downloadable!]
  2. Möller, Iris, 2000. "Produktivitätswirkung von Mitarbeiterbeteiligungen (Productivity effect of employee participation in asset formation)," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 33(4), pages 565-582. [Downloadable!]
  3. John S Heywood & Colin Green, 2007. "Does profit sharing increase training by reducing turnover?," Working Papers 005113, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department. [Downloadable!]
  4. Matthias Göcke, 2009. "Efficiency Wages and Negotiated Profit-Sharing under Uncertainty," MAGKS Papers on Economics 200919, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung). [Downloadable!]
  5. Daniel Parent, 2002. "Incentives? The Effect of Profit Sharing Plans Offered by Previous Employers on Current Wages," CIRANO Working Papers 2002s-54, CIRANO. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Rick Harbaugh, . "Employee Stock Ownership vs. Profit Sharing," Claremont Colleges Working Papers 2000-28, Claremont Colleges. [Downloadable!]
  7. Michael J. Handel & Maury Gittleman, 2000. "Is there a Wage Payoff to Innovative Work Practices?," Macroeconomics 0004032, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  8. Joanne Loundes, 2000. "Management and Industrial Relations Practices and Outcomes in Australian Workplaces," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2000n12, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne. [Downloadable!]
  9. Xin Meng & Frances Perkins, 1996. "Behavioural Differences among Chinese Firms From the Perspective of Earnings Determination," Departmental Working Papers 1996-09, Australian National University, Economics RSPAS. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  10. Derek C. Jones & Panu Kalmi & Mikko Mäkinen, 2006. "The Productivity Effects of Stock Option Schemes: Evidence from Finnish Panel Data," Discussion Papers 1026, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy. [Downloadable!]
  11. Koskela, Erkki & König, Jan, 2008. "Strategic Outsourcing, Profit Sharing and Equilibrium Unemployment," IZA Discussion Papers 3413, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
  12. Daniel Parent, 2001. "Incentive Pay in the United States: Its Determinants and Its Effects," CIRANO Working Papers 2001s-04, CIRANO. [Downloadable!]
  13. Erkki Koskela & Jan König, 2008. "Flexible Outsourcing, Profit Sharing and Equilibrium Unemployment," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
  14. Takao Kato & Motohiro Morishima, 1998. "The Productivity Effects of Human Resource Management Practices: Evidence from New Japanese Panel Data," Macroeconomics 9812003, EconWPA, revised 08 Dec 1998. [Downloadable!]
  15. Benjamin Campbell, 2003. "Local Labor Market Conditions and Stock Options Incidence: A Study of the Information Technology Sector," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series 1094, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley. [Downloadable!]
  16. Tim R.L. Fry & Kelly Jarvis & Joanne Loundes, 2002. "Are Pro-Reformers Better Performers?," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2002n18, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne. [Downloadable!]
  17. Elizabeth Webster & Joanne Loundes, 2002. "Reliance on Income Support in Australia: Prevalence and Persistence," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2002n07, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Use the JEL tree to browse through the database by subfields.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-8.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.