Author
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to study the relationship between liquidity and returns in the main European stock markets for the period of January 2005- December 2020. Asset liquidity is measured by three correlated indicators (ROLL, CS and HL). The methodology adopted consists of constructing threshold autoregressive model (TAR) for market returns while using liquidity indicators as a transition variable. The distinction between the different regimes helps clarify the relationship between these variables. The results show that the detected thresholds are different depending on the stock market. We then find that the impact of the liquidity indicator on returns is different for regime 1 and regime 2, and we propose an economic explanation for this difference. main European stock markets for the period of January 2005- December 2020. Asset liquidity is measured by three correlated indicators (ROLL, CS and HL). The methodology adopted consists of constructing threshold autoregressive model (TAR) for market returns while using liquidity indicators as a transition variable. The distinction between the different regimes helps clarify the relationship between these variables. The results show that the detected thresholds are different depending on the stock market. We then find that the impact of the liquidity indicator on returns is different for regime 1 and regime 2, and we propose an economic explanation for this difference. main European stock markets for the period of January 2005- December 2020. Asset liquidity is measured by three correlated indicators (ROLL, CS and HL). The methodology adopted consists of constructing threshold autoregressive model (TAR) for market returns while using liquidity indicators as a transition variable. The distinction between the different regimes helps clarify the relationship between these variables. The results show that the detected thresholds are different depending on the stock market. We then find that the impact of the liquidity indicator on returns is different for regime 1 and regime 2, and we propose an economic explanation for this difference.
Suggested Citation
Boumediene Souiki & Françoise Seyte, 2024.
"Liquidity on Eurozone stock markets: A non-linear approach,"
Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 44(1), pages 321-340.
Handle:
RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-21-01064
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-21-01064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-21-01064.html
