IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2020i3p64-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Generation Y Consumers Differ in their Mobile Banking Utility? Evidence from South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Marko Van Deventer

    (North-West University)

Abstract

Mobile banking utility such as convenience, usefulness and ease of use as well the time and money saving properties associated with using mobile banking, is important to banking consumers. As such, it is important that retail banks invest the necessary time and resources into their mobile banking channels, not only to ensure adequate mobile banking utility, but also to differentiate its mobile channels from other mobile banking channels in the highly competitive mobile banking market. To this end, the purpose of this study was to investigate mobile banking utility differences amongst Generation Y consumers of the major South African retail banks. A descriptive and single cross-sectional research design informed the methodology followed in this study. Self-administered survey questionnaires were used to collect data from a convenience sample of 334 Generation Y mobile banking consumers. Descriptive statistics, reliability and validity measures, Pearson’s product-moment correlation analysis, collinearity diagnostics as well as one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to analyse the data. The results suggest that there are differences between Generation Y consumers of the major South African retail banks and attitudes towards mobile banking, perceived usefulness, ease of use, compatibility and perceived mobile banking self-efficacy. Retail banks can use the findings of this study to improve its mobile banking utility and in doing so, gain greater market share and improved customer satisfaction and loyalty.

Suggested Citation

  • Marko Van Deventer, 2021. "Do Generation Y Consumers Differ in their Mobile Banking Utility? Evidence from South Africa," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 17(3), pages 64-77, JUNE.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2020:i:3:p:64-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/AUDOE/article/view/843/1355
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2020:i:3:p:64-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.