A Multi-Country Comparison of the Efficiency of the German Telecommunications Industry
AbstractIn an international comparison of the efficiency of the telecommunications (TC) industry for the period 1981 to 2002 Germany is in a middle position; France and Great Britain are better, while the Netherlands and the United States are in a less favourable position. However, supply-side efficiency is subject to strong fluctuations over time. Germany's TC industry suffered a temporary slump in efficiency compared with the other countries during deregulation, and this could only be made up again gradually from 2000. For a time Germany was actually bottom of the list, but in 2001 it had moved up again to fourth place. The fluctuation can be interpreted in this way: Germany undertook the structural reforms needed to increase efficiency in the TC industry later than other countries, and the first signs of success only appeared after 1999, the year of the low. In this analysis the stochastic possible production frontiers (SPFs) method is used for the first time in a multi-country comparison of the TC industry. The advantage of this method over others is that it is based on a well-founded theoretical concept of production.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research in its journal Weekly Report.
Volume (Year): 1 (2005)
Issue (Month): 26 ()
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.