IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwwob/80-37-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parteianhänger: Wohlhabende neigen zu Union und FDP - und zu den Grünen

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Bach
  • Markus M. Grabka

Abstract

Using data from the Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP), it is possible to analyze the statistical correlation between an individual's political party identification and their income and wealth. The analysis indicates that higher earners and more affluent individuals tend to support the Christian Democratic Union of Germany/Christian Social Union of Bavaria (CDU/CSU) and the Free Democratic Party (FDP), but an above average number also identify with the Greens. The situation is the reverse for the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) and, particularly, for the Left Party (Die Linke). The lower the income and individual's net wealth, the more pronounced their support for both of these political parties. Tax policy proposals by the various political parties are at the heart of the current national election campaign and reveal major differences between the parties. The center-right parties reject tax increases for the rich while the parties to the left of the political spectrum are in favor of such a step. Supporters of the Greens (Bündnis90/Die Grünen) occupy a special position as a considerable share of these would be personally affected by the proposed tax plans. The current "wealth tax" plans proposed by the opposition parties will, however, only have a significant impact on the most affluent five percent of the population. Mit den Daten des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP) kann der statistische Zusammenhang zwischen der Neigung von Personen zu politischen Parteien sowie deren Einkommen und Vermögen untersucht werden. Dabei zeigt sich, dass Besserverdiener und Wohlhabende zur Union und zur FDP neigen, aber auch überdurchschnittlich zu den Grünen. Ein umgekehrtes Bild ergibt sich für die SPD und vor allem für die Linke. Je geringer die Einkommen und Vermögen ausfallen, desto ausgeprägter ist die Anhängerschaft für diese beiden Parteien. Steuer- und finanzpolitische Vorschläge der Parteien stehen im aktuellen Bundestagswahlkampf im Mittelpunkt und weisen große Unterschiede auf. Die bürgerlichen Parteien lehnen Steuererhöhungen für Wohlhabende ab, während die Parteien des linken politischen Spektrums sie fordern. Eine Sonderstellung nehmen Bündnis90/Die Grünen ein. Deren Steuerpläne würden auch einen nennenswerten Teil der eigenen Anhängerschaft treffen. Von den vorliegenden Reichensteuer-Plänen der Oppositionsparteien werden allerdings insgesamt nur die wohlhabendsten fünf Prozent der Bevölkerung nennenswert belastet.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Bach & Markus M. Grabka, 2013. "Parteianhänger: Wohlhabende neigen zu Union und FDP - und zu den Grünen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(37), pages 11-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:80-37-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.427214.de/13-37-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Party identification; distribution of income and wealth;

    JEL classification:

    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:80-37-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.