IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwwob/79-6-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CCTS-Technologie ein Fehlschlag: Umdenken in der Energiewende notwendig

Author

Listed:
  • Christian von Hirschhausen
  • Johannes Herold
  • Pao-Yu Oei
  • Clemens Haftendorn

Abstract

In den kommenden zwei Jahrzehnten wird die CO2-Abscheidung auf dem deutschen Stromsektor keine Rolle spielen. Dies zeichnet sich spätestens seit der öffentlichen Bekanntgabe von Bundesumweltminister Norbert Röttgen vom 29. Oktober 2011 und der Absage des CCTS-Demonstrationsprojekts am Standort Jänschwalde durch den Energiekonzern Vattenfall ab. Auch auf europäischer Ebene liegen ernüchternde Befunde vor: Keines der ersten sechs europäischen Pilotprojekten wird auf absehbare Zeit seine Ziele, eine geschlossene CCTS-Kette und somit die dauerhafte Vermeidung von CO2-Emissionen, erreichen; viele EU-Mitgliedstaaten haben bis heute die europäische CCTS-Richtlinie 2009/31/EC nicht in nationales Recht umgesetzt, darunter auch Deutschland. Kraftwerksprojekte, die heute noch auf die Verfügbarkeit von CCTS in den kommenden zehn bis 20 Jahren vertrauen, müssen vor diesem Hintergrund als überholt betrachtet werden und sind weder ökonomisch noch klima- oder energiepolitisch sinnvoll.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian von Hirschhausen & Johannes Herold & Pao-Yu Oei & Clemens Haftendorn, 2012. "CCTS-Technologie ein Fehlschlag: Umdenken in der Energiewende notwendig," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 79(6), pages 3-9.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:79-6-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.392564.de/12-6-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pao-Yu Oei and Roman Mendelevitch, 2016. "European Scenarios of CO2 Infrastructure Investment until 2050," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Sustainab).
    2. Isabel Teichmann, 2014. "Technical Greenhouse-Gas Mitigation Potentials of Biochar Soil Incorporation in Germany," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1406, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Isabel Teichmann, 2015. "An Economic Assessment of Soil Carbon Sequestration with Biochar in Germany," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1476, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Bartholdsen, Hans-Karl & Eidens, Anna & Löffler, Konstantin & Seehaus, Frederik & Wejda, Felix & Burandt, Thorsten & Oei, Pao-Yu & Kemfert, Claudia & Hirschhausen, Christian von, 2019. "Pathways for Germany's Low-Carbon Energy Transformation Towards 2050," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation; CO2-Abscheidung; Regulierung; Energiepolitik;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:79-6-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.