IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwdwr/dwr10-41-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reform Proposal for Marriage Taxation in Germany: De Facto Income Splitting with a Low Transferable Amount

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Bach
  • Björn Fischer
  • Peter Haan
  • Katharina Wrohlich

Abstract

Two traditional options for reforming Ehegattensplitting, the joint taxation of married couples with full income splitting, are de facto income splitting (Realsplitting) or individual taxation with a transferable personal allowance. However, these proposals do not significantly reduce the marginal tax burden on the secondary earner’s income and therefore only minimally encourage married women to participate in the labor market. Another option for reform is an additional personal allowance for married couples, but this concept is difficult to understand and further benefits dual income couples with middle and high incomes. Moreover, alternative methods of taxing married couples in Germany must adhere to specific legal regulations. A satisfactory compromise would thus be de facto income splitting for married couples with a transferable amount equal to the personal allowance. This proposal fulfills the legal criteria, is easily understandable, generates a certain amount of additional tax revenue, avoids burdening the lower and middle income brackets, and encourages secondary earners to participate in the labor market.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Bach & Björn Fischer & Peter Haan & Katharina Wrohlich, 2020. "Reform Proposal for Marriage Taxation in Germany: De Facto Income Splitting with a Low Transferable Amount," DIW Weekly Report, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 10(41/42), pages 423-432.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwdwr:dwr10-41-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.800659.de/dwr-20-41-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maximilian Blesch & Philipp Eisenhauer & Peter Haan & Boryana Ilieva & Annekatrin Schrenker & Georg Weizsäcker, 2023. "Biased Wage Expectations and Female Labor Supply," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 411, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Family taxation; tax reform; female labor supply; income distribution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • D13 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Production and Intrahouse Allocation
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwdwr:dwr10-41-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.