IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dij/revfcs/v22y2019i4p57-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Impact Bonds: A New Public Management Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Le Pendeven

    (Audencia Business School)

Abstract

The Social Impact Bond (SIB) is a new tool for financing innovative social projects. SIBs were first used in 2010 in the United Kingdom in a programme involving Peterborough prison inmates. This financial technique has since been introduced across the world. We study SIBs within the New Public Management (NPM) framework provided by Dunleavy et al. (2005). We analyse to what extent this new financial tool reflects NPM with respect to its three main characteristics: disaggregation, competition and incentivization. 62 interviews were conducted with SIBs experts and practitioners from public, financial, private and social organisations in several countries. These interviews were made when the first SIBs in English-speaking countries had finished, and at a time when the French government had decided to massively stimulate this new financial tool through a dedicated Call for Projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Le Pendeven, 2019. "Social Impact Bonds: A New Public Management Perspective," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 22(N° Spécia), pages 57-84, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:22:y:2019:i:4:p:57-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.openedition.org/fcs/3119
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diana Pop & Caroline Marie-Jeanne & Régis Dumoulin, 2023. "Socialium or the Financial Price of Social Responsibility [« Socialium » ou le prix financier de la responsabilité sociale]," Post-Print hal-04120305, HAL.
    2. Alessandro Rizzello & Abdellah Kabli, 2020. "Sustainable Financial Partnerships for the SDGs: The Case of Social Impact Bonds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Julie RIJPENS & Marie J. BOUCHARD & Emilien GRUET & Gabriel SALATHÉ-BEAULIEU, 2020. "Social Impact Bonds: Promises versus facts. What does the recent scientific literature tell us?," CIRIEC Working Papers 2015, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social impact bonds; innovation financing; New Public Management; social innovation; financial innovation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L33 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprise and Nonprofit Institutions; Privatization; Contracting Out

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:22:y:2019:i:4:p:57-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Informatique Technique MSH Dijon (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.revues.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.