IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dij/revfcs/v19y2016i2p1-25..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les facteurs déterminants de la mise en place du Say on Pay au Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Serret

    (Université Bretagne-Sud EA 4251, IREA)

  • Sylvie Berthelot

    (Université de Sherbrooke Canada)

  • Michel Coulmont

    (Université de Sherbrooke Canada)

Abstract

(VF)Le Say on Pay (SoP) autorise le vote des actionnaires sur la rémunération des dirigeants. Contrairement à de nombreux pays, le SoP n’est pas réglementé au Canada, mais de plus en plus d’entreprises le pratiquent. Nous mettons en évidence les facteurs contribuant à l’adoption volontaire du vote consultatif. Ils résultent d’une volonté de réduction des coûts d’agence, et d’un isomorphisme des pratiques organisationnelles. Ainsi, l’activisme sous forme de propositions de résolutions, la taille de l’entreprise et la double cotation favorisent l’adoption du vote consultatif, contrairement au niveau de rémunération du dirigeant.(VA)Say on pay (SoP) allows shareholders to vote on executive compensation. Unlike in a number of other countries, SoP is not prescribed by regulation in Canada, although more and more firms are now adopting this practice. This article examines the factors underlying the voluntary adoption of the advisory vote, which are tied to a desire to reduce agency costs and the isomorphism of organizational practices. This decision is influenced by activism in the form of proposed resolutions, firm size and dual listing, rather than by executive compensation.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Serret & Sylvie Berthelot & Michel Coulmont, 2016. "Les facteurs déterminants de la mise en place du Say on Pay au Canada," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 19(2), pages 1-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:1-25.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fcs.revues.org/1783
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    gouvernance des entreprises; théorie de l’agence; rémunération des dirigeants; Say on Pay; théorie néo-institutionnelle; corporate governance; agency theory; CEO compensation; advisory vote; institutional theory.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:1-25.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Informatique Technique MSH Dijon (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.revues.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.