IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fserec/y2014p170-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis Of E-Government Initiatives Worldwide

Author

Listed:
  • George SCHIN

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

Abstract

Existing studies of e-government are mainly focused on the availability and level of complexity and customization of online services provided by public institutions at national level. This article aims at reviewing the main peculiarities of e-government initiatives developed worldwide, according to the ranking of different countries provided by 2013 International e-Government Ranking, developed by Waseda University Institute of e-Government. The main indicators embedded in this study are the following: network preparedness/infrastructure, management optimization, required interface/functioning applications, national e-government portal, e-participation/digital inclusion. Romania holds the 42 th place in this ranking, having assigned a score of 49.72/100. The results of the first survey are relevant for Romanian decision-makers in the field of e-governance, as our country needs to bridge the gaps between its e-government strategy and these of the countries included in our presentation.

Suggested Citation

  • George SCHIN, 2014. "Comparative Analysis Of E-Government Initiatives Worldwide," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 170-174.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fserec:y:2014:p:170-174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rce.feaa.ugal.ro/images/stories/RCE2014/papers/GeorgeSchin1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Madalina Elena MIHAILESCU, 2015. "Public Service in Age of Globalization," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 35-42.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fserec:y:2014:p:170-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.