IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2020i2p58-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-Government Research Still Matter? A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Oana-Ramona LOBONT

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

  • Alexandra-Madalina TARAN

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

  • Florin COSTEA

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

This paper proposes an analysis of the scientific works carried out on the topic of research specific to the field of e-government and to investigate the connection between the topics in the research area. In several countries, the desire to develop a new organizational structure of the e-government is in the initial stages. That is why we consider that there is still room for research in this field, especially in terms of insufficient clarification of the phenomenon, both conceptually and procedurally. Our study focuses on bibliometric analysis, investigating 484 references collected from the database of the Core Web of Science (WoS) collection. At the basis of the empirical approach proposed to render in a graphic map the results of the analysis, we resorted to the research tools VOSviewer similarities visualization program. In this research, we analyzed co-occurrence of keywords, co-authorship and co-citation in the field of e-governance. Such an approach is not only the state of knowledge but also has the most important influence, the authors, institutions and countries that develop research in the field Our results evidence the existence of strong links between the main tools adopted by different countries regarding e-government. Taking into account the stage where most countries are regarding e-government, research in this area is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Oana-Ramona LOBONT & Alexandra-Madalina TARAN & Florin COSTEA, 2020. "E-Government Research Still Matter? A Bibliometric Analysis," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 58-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2020:i:2:p:58-63
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35219/eai15840409106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2020_2/Lobont_Taran_Costea.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35219/eai15840409106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alzahrani, Latifa & Al-Karaghouli, Wafi & Weerakkody, Vishanth, 2017. "Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 164-175.
    2. Isaac Kofi Mensah & Jianing Mi, 2018. "Exploring the Impact of Demographic Factors on E-Government Services Adoption," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 31(3), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. VĂTAVU Sorana & ȚĂRAN Alexandra-Mădălina & MOLDOVAN Nicoleta-Claudia & LOBONȚ Oana-Ramona, 2022. "Does Technical And Democratic Governance Have The Potential To Enhance Health Spending Allocations?," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(3), pages 251-268, December.
    2. Gabriela Badareu & Nicoleta Mihaela Doran & Silvia Puiu & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Alina Georgiana Manta, 2023. "Is the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility, Environment and Energy Sufficiently Debated Nowadays?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Andreea-Florentina Crăciun & Alexandra-Mădălina Țăran & Grațiela Georgiana Noja & Marilen Gabriel Pirtea & Raluca-Ioana Răcătăian, 2023. "Advanced Modelling of the Interplay between Public Governance and Digital Transformation: New Empirical Evidence from Structural Equation Modelling and Gaussian and Mixed-Markov Graphical Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Dejan Ravšelj & Lan Umek & Ljupčo Todorovski & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2022. "A Review of Digital Era Governance Research in the First Two Decades: A Bibliometric Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-27, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glyptis, Loukas & Christofi, Michael & Vrontis, Demetris & Giudice, Manlio Del & Dimitriou, Salomi & Michael, Panayiota, 2020. "E-Government implementation challenges in small countries: The project manager's perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Osama Abied & Othman Ibrahim & Siti Nuur-Ila Mat Kamal & Ibrahim M. Alfadli & Weam M. Binjumah & Norafida Ithnin & Maged Nasser, 2022. "Probing Determinants Affecting Intention to Adopt Cloud Technology in E-Government Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    3. Bettina Distel & Holger Koelmann & Ralf Plattfaut & Jörg Becker, 2022. "Watch who you trust! A structured literature review to build a typology of e-government risks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 789-818, December.
    4. Patrycja Kokot-Stępień & Luiza Piersiala, 2019. "Analiza funkcjonowania technologii informacyjnych w administracji publicznej," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 56, pages 91-103.
    5. BARCEVICIUS Egidijus & CIBAITE Guonda & CODAGNONE Cristiano & GINEIKYTE Vaida & KLIMAVICIUTE Luka & LIVA Giovanni & MATULEVIC Loreta & MISURACA Gianluca & VANINI Irene, 2019. "Exploring Digital Government transformation in the EU," JRC Research Reports JRC118857, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Dodik Ariyanto & Ayu Aryista Dewi & Henny Triyana Hasibuan & Rizky Bagus Paramadani, 2022. "The Success of Information Systems and Sustainable Information Society: Measuring the Implementation of a Village Financial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Pankaj Tiwari, 2021. "Electronic banking adoption in Ethiopia: an empirical investigation," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(9), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Rana, Mohammad B. & Morgan, Glenn, 2019. "Twenty-five years of business systems research and lessons for international business studies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 513-532.
    9. Pynnönen, Sari & Haltia, Emmi & Hujala, Teppo, 2021. "Digital forest information platform as service innovation: Finnish Metsaan.fi service use, users and utilisation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Mosleh Zeebaree & Mary Agoyi & Musbah Aqel, 2022. "Sustainable Adoption of E-Government from the UTAUT Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    11. Xusen Cheng & Fei Guo & Jin Chen & Kejiang Li & Yihui Zhang & Peng Gao, 2019. "Exploring the Trust Influencing Mechanism of Robo-Advisor Service: A Mixed Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Joanna Ejdys, 2020. "Trust-Based Determinants of Future Intention to Use Technology," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 60-68.
    13. Christofi, Michael & Vrontis, Demetris & Cadogan, John W., 2021. "Micro-foundational ambidexterity and multinational enterprises: A systematic review and a conceptual framework," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    14. Leo Sleuwaegen & Peter M. Smith, 2022. "Who purchases cross-border? Individual and country level determinants of the decision to purchase cross-border in the European Single Market," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 749-785, September.
    15. Joanna Ejdys & Aleksandra Gulc, 2020. "Trust in Courier Services and Its Antecedents as a Determinant of Perceived Service Quality and Future Intention to Use Courier Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Kaveh TEYMOURNEJAD & Viana VARMAZYAR & Mohammad Mahdi GHALANDARI, 2019. "Investigating The Effect Of Key Elements Affecting The Trust On E-Government Acceptance From Citizens' Perspectives In District 1 Of Tehran," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 274-287, November.
    17. Ashikur Rahman & Teoh Ai Ping & Syeda Khadija Mubeen & Imran Mahmud & Ghazanfer Ali Abbasi, 2022. "What Influences Home Gardeners’ Food Waste Composting Intention in High-Rise Buildings in Dhaka Megacity, Bangladesh? An Integrated Model of TPB and DMP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Wenjuan Li & Lan Xue, 2021. "Analyzing the Critical Factors Influencing Post-Use Trust and Its Impact on Citizens’ Continuous-Use Intention of E-Government: Evidence from Chinese Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Hasan Zahid & Badariah Haji Din, 2019. "Determinants of Intention to Adopt E-Government Services in Pakistan: An Imperative for Sustainable Development," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-25, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2020:i:2:p:58-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.