IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dah/aeqaeq/v67_y2021_i2_q2_p113-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pandemic Versus Financial Shocks: Comparison of Two Episodes on the Bitcoin Market

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Horky
  • Mihai Mutascu
  • Jarko Fidrmuc

Abstract

With its rising popularity, the Bitcoin has also become increasingly independent from global financial markets. Recently, it has joined the class of alternative assets. We use the newly developed wavelet methodology to analyze daily data to compare the COVID-19 pandemic at the beginning of 2020 with the bear market episode at the end of 2018. In both cases, attention signals and a general panic are the main drivers of the Bitcoin fluctuations. We show that the Bitcoin’s dynamic is more complex than the dynamics of standard financial assets. The Bitcoin is, on the one hand, subject to pandemic shocks but also represents an important source of attention signals. On the other hand, because the Bitcoin additionally reacts on an emotional basis, it might react faster than other assets and thus creates a market signal itself. Moreover, we identify short cycles (of several days), which may possibly be related to demand factors, while long cycles (of several weeks) seem to mirror supply factors and might be related to Bitcoin mining in China. Finally, the analysis underlines the importance of continuous financial education and communication by the supervisory authorities about new, alternative financial assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Horky & Mihai Mutascu & Jarko Fidrmuc, 2021. "Pandemic Versus Financial Shocks: Comparison of Two Episodes on the Bitcoin Market," Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik), Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Berlin, vol. 67(2), pages 113-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:dah:aeqaeq:v67_y2021_i2_q2_p113-141
    DOI: 10.3790/aeq.67.2.113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.67.2.113
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers (2008 onwards); Pay-per-view access from https://elibrary.duncker-humblot.com/journals/aeq (2008 onwards) and http://www.genios.de (2008 onwards)
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/aeq.67.2.113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Horky, Florian & Rachel, Carolina & Fidrmuc, Jarko, 2022. "Price determinants of non-fungible tokens in the digital art market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bitcoin; financial shocks; pandemic shocks; wavelet;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • F31 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Exchange

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dah:aeqaeq:v67_y2021_i2_q2_p113-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: E-Publishing-Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.duncker-humblot.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.