IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dah/aeqaeq/v65_y2019_i3_q3_p209-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends and Cycles in U.S. Labor-Market Slack, 1994–2019

Author

Listed:
  • John Komlos

Abstract

Janet Yellen, former Chair of the Federal Reserve, intimated that the official unemployment rate (U3) is an inadequate measure of labor market slack when she highlighted the “possibility… that labor market slack is not appropriately measured by the civilian unemployment rate” (2019). Thus, we explore the difference between U3 and a more inclusive estimate of unemployment, U6, in order to understand the extent to which U3 misinforms the public, policy makers, and researchers.We find that the gap varies substantially over the business cycle and especially so for the most vulnerable – minorities, youth, and the less educated. This is because these groups are most likely to work part-time involuntarily the longest after the end of a recession and therefore bear the brunt of the burden of its lingering impact for many years thereafter. For African Americans, for instance, it took 7 years and 4 months longer for the recession of 1990/1991 to end. After the Great Recession the Hispanic gap also remained at an elevated level of 10 percentage points from October 2009 through June 2013. In January 2011 U6 climbed to 47.5% among African American youth and the U6-U3 gap was 18 percentage points and was similarly large among African Americans without a high-school diploma. In other words, not only does U3 mislead but the degree to which it does so varies greatly by ethnic group.

Suggested Citation

  • John Komlos, 2019. "Trends and Cycles in U.S. Labor-Market Slack, 1994–2019," Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik), Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Berlin, vol. 65(3), pages 209-235.
  • Handle: RePEc:dah:aeqaeq:v65_y2019_i3_q3_p209-235
    DOI: 10.3790/aeq.65.3.209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.65.3.209
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers (2008 onwards); Pay-per-view access from https://elibrary.duncker-humblot.com/journals/aeq (2008 onwards) and http://www.genios.de (2008 onwards)

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/aeq.65.3.209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fontanari, Claudia & Palumbo, Antonella & Salvatori, Chiara, 2022. "The updated Okun method for estimation of potential output with alternative measures of labor underutilization," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 158-178.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Unemployment; U6; African American unemployment; Hispanic unemployment discouraged workers; labor market slack;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J40 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - General
    • J49 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Other
    • J69 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dah:aeqaeq:v65_y2019_i3_q3_p209-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: E-Publishing-Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.duncker-humblot.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.