IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/wotrrv/v22y2023i2p232-254_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to Panel Composition in RTA Dispute Settlement: Evaluating Solutions to a Perennial Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Falls, Scott

Abstract

In the wake of the demise of the WTO's Appellate Body, there has been a growing trend of states resorting to the dispute settlement mechanisms under their regional trade agreements (RTAs) to resolve international trade disputes. While the vast majority of these mechanisms have never been used, many contain defective procedural provisions that are likely to slow down or completely derail the dispute settlement process should those provisions be invoked. This is particularly true of mechanisms that effectively permit a respondent to block or delay the composition of a panel to hear a dispute. This article examines the issues of ‘panel blocking’ and panel composition delay tactics in RTA dispute settlement with reference to both past and present practice, and provides a textual analysis of a cross-section of existing RTAs to identify procedural defects and prescribe solutions for ensuring timely panel composition in future disputes.

Suggested Citation

  • Falls, Scott, 2023. "Barriers to Panel Composition in RTA Dispute Settlement: Evaluating Solutions to a Perennial Problem," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 232-254, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:22:y:2023:i:2:p:232-254_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474745622000398/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:22:y:2023:i:2:p:232-254_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/wtr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.