IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/wotrrv/v19y2020i1p123-136_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The First WTO's Ruling on National Security Exception: Balancing Interests or Opening Pandora's Box?

Author

Listed:
  • Boklan, Daria
  • Bahri, Amrita

Abstract

For a multilateral system to be sustainable, it is important to have several escape clauses which can allow countries to protect their national security concerns. However, when these escape windows are too wide or ambiguous, defining their ambit and scope becomes challenging yet crucial to ensure that they are not open to misuse. The recent Panel Ruling in Russia – Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit is the very first attempt by the WTO to clarify the scope and ambit of National Security Exception. In this paper, we argue that the Panel has employed a combination of an objective and a subjective approach to interpret this exception. This hybrid approach to interpret GATT Article XXI (b) provides a systemic balance between the sovereign rights of the members to invoke the security exception and their right to free and open trade. But has this Ruling opened Pandora's box? In this paper, we address this issue by providing an in-depth analysis of the Panel's decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Boklan, Daria & Bahri, Amrita, 2020. "The First WTO's Ruling on National Security Exception: Balancing Interests or Opening Pandora's Box?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 123-136, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:19:y:2020:i:1:p:123-136_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474745619000430/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. TODO Yasuyuki, 2022. "Resilient and Innovative Supply Chains: Evidence-based policy and managerial implications," Policy Discussion Papers 22024, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:19:y:2020:i:1:p:123-136_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/wtr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.