IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v9y2021i3p650-657_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Endogenous democracy: causal evidence from the potato productivity shock in the old world

Author

Listed:
  • Barceló, Joan
  • Rosas, Guillermo

Abstract

Despite a high cross-country correlation between development and democracy, it is difficult to gauge the impact of economic development on the probability that autocracies will transition to democracy because of endogeneity, especially due to reverse causation and omitted variable bias. Hence, whether development causes democracy remains a contested issue. We exploit exogeneity in the regional variation of potato cultivation along with the timing of the introduction of potatoes to the Old World (i.e., a potato productivity shock) to identify a causal effect of urbanization, a proxy for economic development, on democratization. Our results, which hold under sensitivity analyses that question the validity of the exclusion restriction, present new evidence of the existence of a causal effect of economic development on democracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Barceló, Joan & Rosas, Guillermo, 2021. "Endogenous democracy: causal evidence from the potato productivity shock in the old world," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 650-657, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:650-657_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847019000621/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:650-657_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.