IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v8y2020i1p160-168_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maps in People’s Heads: Assessing a New Measure of Context

Author

Listed:
  • Wong, Cara
  • Bowers, Jake
  • Rubenson, Daniel
  • Fredrickson, Mark
  • Rundlett, Ashlea

Abstract

To understand the relationship between place and politics, we must measure both political attitudes and the ways in which place is represented in the minds of individuals. In this paper, we assess a new measure of mental representation of geography, in which survey respondents draw their own local communities on maps and describe them. We use a panel study in Canada to present evidence that these maps are both valid and reliable measures of a personally relevant geographic area, laying the measurement groundwork for the growing number of studies using this technology. We hope to set efforts to measure “place†for the study of context and politics on firmer footing. Our validity assessments show that individuals are thinking about people and places with which they have regular contact when asked to draw their communities. Our reliability assessments show that people can draw more or less the same map twice, even when the exercise is repeated months later. Finally, we provide evidence that the concept of community is a tangible consideration in the minds of ordinary citizens and is not simply a normative aspiration or motivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wong, Cara & Bowers, Jake & Rubenson, Daniel & Fredrickson, Mark & Rundlett, Ashlea, 2020. "Maps in People’s Heads: Assessing a New Measure of Context," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 160-168, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:160-168_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847018000511/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:160-168_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.