IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v10y2022i3p634-641_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting anomalies in data on government violence

Author

Listed:
  • Bond, Kanisha D.
  • Conrad, Courtenay R.
  • Moses, Dylan
  • Simmons, Joel W.

Abstract

Can data on government coercion and violence be trusted when the data are generated by state itself? In this paper, we investigate the extent to which data from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) regarding the use of force by corrections officers against prison inmates between 2008 and 2017 conform to Benford's Law. Following a growing data forensics literature, we expect misreporting of the use-of-force in California state prisons to cause the observed data to deviate from Benford's distribution. Statistical hypothesis tests and further investigation of CDCR data—which show both temporal and cross-sectional variance in conformity with Benford's Law—are consistent with misreporting of the use-of-force by the CDCR. Our results suggest that data on government coercion generated by the state should be inspected carefully before being used to test hypotheses or make policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bond, Kanisha D. & Conrad, Courtenay R. & Moses, Dylan & Simmons, Joel W., 2022. "Detecting anomalies in data on government violence," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 634-641, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:634-641_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847021000406/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:634-641_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.