IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v10y2022i2p372-390_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Point break: using machine learning to uncover a critical mass in women's representation

Author

Listed:
  • Funk, Kendall D.
  • Paul, Hannah L.
  • Philips, Andrew Q.

Abstract

Decades of research has debated whether women first need to reach a “critical mass” in the legislature before they can effectively influence legislative outcomes. This study contributes to the debate using supervised tree-based machine learning to study the relationship between increasing variation in women's legislative representation and the allocation of government expenditures in three policy areas: education, healthcare, and defense. We find that women's representation predicts spending in all three areas. We also find evidence of critical mass effects as the relationships between women's representation and government spending are nonlinear. However, beyond critical mass, our research points to a potential critical mass interval or critical limit point in women's representation. We offer guidance on how these results can inform future research using standard parametric models.

Suggested Citation

  • Funk, Kendall D. & Paul, Hannah L. & Philips, Andrew Q., 2022. "Point break: using machine learning to uncover a critical mass in women's representation," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 372-390, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:372-390_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847021000510/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:372-390_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.