IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v10y2022i1p198-205_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Betting on the underdog: the influence of social networks on vote choice

Author

Listed:
  • Fredén, Annika
  • Rheault, Ludovic
  • Indridason, Indridi H.

Abstract

People are commonly expected not to waste their vote on parties with small probabilities of being elected. Yet, many end up voting for underdogs. We argue that voters gauge the popular support for their preferred party from their social networks. When social networks function as echo chambers, a feature observed in real-life networks, voters overestimate underdogs’ chances of winning. We conduct voting experiments in which some treatment groups receive signals from a simulated network. We compare the effect of networks with a high degree of homogeneity against random networks. We find that homophilic networks increase the level of support for underdogs, which provides evidence to back up anecdotal claims that echo chambers foster the development of fringe parties.

Suggested Citation

  • Fredén, Annika & Rheault, Ludovic & Indridason, Indridi H., 2022. "Betting on the underdog: the influence of social networks on vote choice," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 198-205, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:198-205_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847020000217/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:198-205_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.