IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v30y2022i3p311-327_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Populist are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Di Cocco, Jessica
  • Monechi, Bernardo

Abstract

One of the main challenges in comparative studies on populism concerns its temporal and spatial measurements within and between a large number of parties and countries. Textual analysis has proved useful for these purposes, and automated methods can further improve research in this direction. Here, we propose a method to derive a score of parties’ levels of populism using supervised machine learning to perform textual analysis on national manifestos. We illustrate the advantages of our approach, which allows for measuring populism for a vast number of parties and countries without resource-intensive human-coding processes and provides accurate, updated information for temporal and spatial comparisons of populism. Furthermore, our method allows for obtaining a continuous score of populism, which ensures more fine-grained analyses of the party landscape while reducing the risk of arbitrary classifications. To illustrate the potential contribution of this score, we use it as a proxy for parties’ levels of populism, analyzing average trends in six European countries from the early 2000s for nearly two decades.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Cocco, Jessica & Monechi, Bernardo, 2022. "How Populist are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 311-327, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:30:y:2022:i:3:p:311-327_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198721000292/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:30:y:2022:i:3:p:311-327_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.