IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v30y2022i1p89-112_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining Outcome-Based and Preference-Based Matching: A Constrained Priority Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Acharya, Avidit
  • Bansak, Kirk
  • Hainmueller, Jens

Abstract

We introduce a constrained priority mechanism that combines outcome-based matching from machine learning with preference-based allocation schemes common in market design. Using real-world data, we illustrate how our mechanism could be applied to the assignment of refugee families to host country locations, and kindergarteners to schools. Our mechanism allows a planner to first specify a threshold $\bar g$ for the minimum acceptable average outcome score that should be achieved by the assignment. In the refugee matching context, this score corresponds to the probability of employment, whereas in the student assignment context, it corresponds to standardized test scores. The mechanism is a priority mechanism that considers both outcomes and preferences by assigning agents (refugee families and students) based on their preferences, but subject to meeting the planner’s specified threshold. The mechanism is both strategy-proof and constrained efficient in that it always generates a matching that is not Pareto dominated by any other matching that respects the planner’s threshold.

Suggested Citation

  • Acharya, Avidit & Bansak, Kirk & Hainmueller, Jens, 2022. "Combining Outcome-Based and Preference-Based Matching: A Constrained Priority Mechanism," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 89-112, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:30:y:2022:i:1:p:89-112_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198720000480/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:30:y:2022:i:1:p:89-112_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.