IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/nierev/v190y2004ip89-103_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rate of Return to Teaching: How does it Compare to other Graduate Jobs?

Author

Listed:
  • Dolton, Peter
  • Chung, Tsung-Ping

Abstract

The problem of recruiting graduates into the teaching profession and retaining them has bedevilled recent UK governments. An obvious question to ask is why is teaching so relatively unattractive for graduates. This paper presents a careful analysis of this problem. We compare the earnings of qualified teachers who choose to teach with the ‘opportunity wage’ for those who do not teach. We find that the ‘rate of return on career choice’ for teachers has been declining for both men and women over the past 25 years although teaching is still relatively well paid for women. From our net present value analysis we estimate that males who enter teaching lose, on average, earnings of £40,000 to £67,000 over their lifetime while females could stand to gain average earnings of £42,000 to £65,000 if they opted to become school teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dolton, Peter & Chung, Tsung-Ping, 2004. "The Rate of Return to Teaching: How does it Compare to other Graduate Jobs?," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 190, pages 89-103, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:nierev:v:190:y:2004:i::p:89-103_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0027950100010693/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:nierev:v:190:y:2004:i::p:89-103_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.