IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v11y2015i01p45-68_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meanings and Dimensions of Organizational Justice in China: An Inductive Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Chun
  • Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K.

Abstract

Taking an inductive approach followed by validation techniques, we analyzed the meaning and dimensionality of the organizational justice construct in the People's Republic of China (China). By using qualitative and quantitative methods, we found that organizational justice involves a higher level of subjectivity in the Chinese context. Interpretation and organizational justice judgments depend on the specific situation and social relations involved. The findings revealed similarities with the Western conceptualization with one important exception, suggesting both cultural values and institutional environment shape justice judgments and managerial practices in China. The article concludes with a discussion of the findings and implications for management theory, research, and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Chun & Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K., 2015. "Meanings and Dimensions of Organizational Justice in China: An Inductive Investigation," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 45-68, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:11:y:2015:i:01:p:45-68_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877614000011/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:11:y:2015:i:01:p:45-68_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.