IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v10y2014i03p373-380_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What the Fox Says, How the Fox Works: Deep Contextualization as a Source of New Research Agendas and Theoretical Insights

Author

Listed:
  • Meyer, Klaus E.

Abstract

Using Isaiah Berlin’s distinction between foxes and hedgehogs, John Child’s approach to management research has been described as a fox in a community dominated by hedgehogs. I thus explore Child’s approach to conducting research on China-related phenomena, and place his new work into this trajectory. In doing so, I offer insights into the opportunities and limitations of developing research agendas and generating new theoretical insights from research that is deeply contextualized.

Suggested Citation

  • Meyer, Klaus E., 2014. "What the Fox Says, How the Fox Works: Deep Contextualization as a Source of New Research Agendas and Theoretical Insights," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 373-380, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:10:y:2014:i:03:p:373-380_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877600004307/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xin Li & Li Ma, 2020. "Chinese management research needs self-confidence but not over-confidence," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 481-498, June.
    2. Child, John & Karmowska, Joanna & Shenkar, Oded, 2022. "The role of context in SME internationalization – A review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    3. Ashish Malik & Vijay Pereira & Pawan Budhwar & Fabian Jintae Froese & Dana Minbaeva & James Sun & Anh Tuan Nguyen & Shanzi Xue, 2022. "Multilevel relational influences on HRM practices: a cross-country comparative reflective review of HRM practices in Asia," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 745-779, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:10:y:2014:i:03:p:373-380_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.