IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/judgdm/v6y2011i3p252-262_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research

Author

Listed:
  • Appelt, Kirstin C.
  • Milch, Kerry F.
  • Handgraaf, Michel J. J.
  • Weber, Elke U.

Abstract

Individual differences in decision making are a topic of longstanding interest, but often yield inconsistent and contradictory results. After providing an overview of individual difference measures that have commonly been used in judgment and decision-making (JDM) research, we suggest that our understanding of individual difference effects in JDM may be improved by amending our approach to studying them. We propose four recommendations for improving the pursuit of individual differences in JDM research: a more systematic approach; more theory-driven selection of measures; a reduced emphasis on main effects in favor of interactions between individual differences and decision features, situational factors, and other individual differences; and more extensive communication of results (whether significant or null, published or unpublished). As a first step, we offer our database—the Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory (DMIDI; http://html://www.sjdm.org/dmidi), a free, public resource that categorizes and describes the most common individual difference measures used in JDM research.

Suggested Citation

  • Appelt, Kirstin C. & Milch, Kerry F. & Handgraaf, Michel J. J. & Weber, Elke U., 2011. "The Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 252-262, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:3:p:252-262_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500001455/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:3:p:252-262_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jdm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.