IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/judgdm/v6y2011i3p239-251_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are groups more likely to defer choice than their members?

Author

Listed:
  • White, Chris M.
  • Hafenbrädl, Sebastian
  • Hoffrage, Ulrich
  • Reisen, Nils
  • Woike, Jan K.

Abstract

When faced with a choice, people can normally select no option, i.e., defer choice. Previous research has investigated when and why individuals defer choice, but has almost never looked at these questions when groups of people make choices. Separate reasons predict that groups may be equally likely, more likely, or less likely than individuals to defer choice. We re-analyzed some previously published data and conducted a new experiment to address this question. We found that small groups of people tended to defer choice more often than their members would. Assuming that the groups used a plurality rule but gave additional weight to individual preferences to defer choice allowed the groups’ responses to be predicted quite well. We discuss several possible explanations of these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • White, Chris M. & Hafenbrädl, Sebastian & Hoffrage, Ulrich & Reisen, Nils & Woike, Jan K., 2011. "Are groups more likely to defer choice than their members?," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 239-251, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:3:p:239-251_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500001443/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:3:p:239-251_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jdm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.