IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/judgdm/v12y2017i2p90-103_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An IRT forecasting model: linking proper scoring rules to item response theory

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Bo, Yuanchao
  • Budescu, David V.
  • Lewis, Charles
  • Tetlock, Philip E.
  • Mellers, Barbara

Abstract

This article proposes an Item Response Theoretical (IRT) forecasting model that incorporates proper scoring rules and provides evaluations of forecasters’ expertise in relation to the features of the specific questions they answer. We illustrate the model using geopolitical forecasts obtained by the Good Judgment Project (GJP) (see Mellers, Ungar, Baron, Ramos, Gurcay, Fincher, Scott, Moore, Atanasov, Swift, Murray, Stone & Tetlock, 2014). The expertise estimates from the IRT model, which take into account variation in the difficulty and discrimination power of the events, capture the underlying construct being measured and are highly correlated with the forecasters’ Brier scores. Furthermore, our expertise estimates based on the first three years of the GJP data are better predictors of both the forecasters’ fourth year Brier scores and their activity level than the overall Brier scores obtained and Merkle’s (2016) predictions, based on the same period. Lastly, we discuss the benefits of using event-characteristic information in forecasting.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Bo, Yuanchao & Budescu, David V. & Lewis, Charles & Tetlock, Philip E. & Mellers, Barbara, 2017. "An IRT forecasting model: linking proper scoring rules to item response theory," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 90-103, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:90-103_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500005647/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:90-103_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jdm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.