IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/judgdm/v11y2016i4p361-379_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The persistence of common-ratio effects in multiple-play decisions

Author

Listed:
  • DeKay, Michael L.
  • Schley, Dan R.
  • Miller, Seth A.
  • Erford, Breann M.
  • Sun, Jonghun
  • Karim, Michael N.
  • Lanyon, Mandy B.

Abstract

People often make more rational choices between monetary prospects when their choices will be played out many times rather than just once. For example, previous research has shown that the certainty effect and the possibility effect (two common-ratio effects that violate expected utility theory) are eliminated in multiple-play decisions. This finding is challenged by seven new studies (N = 2391) and two small meta-analyses. Results indicate that, on average, certainty and possibility effects are reduced but not eliminated in multiple-play decisions. Moreover, in our within-participants studies, the certainty and possibility choice patterns almost always remained the modal or majority patterns. Our primary results were not reliably affected by prompts that encouraged a long-run perspective, by participants’ insight into long-run payoffs, or by participants’ numeracy. The persistence of common-ratio effects suggests that the oft-cited benefits of multiple plays for the rationality of decision makers’ choices may be smaller than previously realized.

Suggested Citation

  • DeKay, Michael L. & Schley, Dan R. & Miller, Seth A. & Erford, Breann M. & Sun, Jonghun & Karim, Michael N. & Lanyon, Mandy B., 2016. "The persistence of common-ratio effects in multiple-play decisions," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(4), pages 361-379, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:361-379_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029750000379X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:361-379_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jdm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.