IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v9y2010i03p445-472_99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Old age support in kind

Author

Listed:
  • MIYAZAWA, KAZUTOSHI

Abstract

It has been argued whether a transfer policy for elderly people should be in kind or in cash. This paper presents a rationale to answer the question in an endogenous growth model with a two-way intrafamily transfer in middle age, education for the child as an inter-vivos transfer, and informal parental care in exchange for a bequest. We have two analytical results. First, a transfer in cash, such as a public pension, prevents economic growth because a strategic behavior concerning caregiving generates a disincentive effect on education. Second, a transfer in kind, such as public formal care, promotes economic growth because the valuation of the service generates an additional benefit of education, which dominates the disincentive effect. Our results show that old age support should be in kind rather than in cash in the context of economic growth and also welfare if bequests are strategic.

Suggested Citation

  • Miyazawa, Kazutoshi, 2010. "Old age support in kind," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 445-472, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:9:y:2010:i:03:p:445-472_99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747209990096/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masaya Yasuoka, 2014. "Financing Elderly Care Service Subsidies horizontally differentiated duopoly," Discussion Paper Series 122, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Oct 2014.
    2. Yasuoka, Masaya, 2020. "Subsidies for elderly care with a pay-as-you-go pension," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    3. Masaya Yasuoka, 2019. "Should Public Elderly Care Be Provided?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(1), pages 564-570.
    4. Miyake, Atsushi & Shintani, Masaya & Yasuoka, Masaya, 2021. "Elderly Care and Informal Family Care," MPRA Paper 110126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Masaya Yasuoka, 2013. "Subsidies for Elderly Care in Pay-As-You-Go Pension," Discussion Paper Series 109, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, revised Sep 2013.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:9:y:2010:i:03:p:445-472_99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.