IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jpenef/v14y2015i01p1-18_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price efficiency in the Dutch Annuity Market

Author

Listed:
  • CANNON, EDMUND
  • STEVENS, RALPH
  • TONKS, IAN

Abstract

We provide the first analysis of annuity rates in the Netherlands for the period 2001–2012. During this period, the number of annuity providers was high and stable, and we find that falls in annuity rates can be explained entirely by changes in yields and life expectancy. We show that annuitants could have increased their annuity income by about 5%, by shopping around and purchasing their annuities from alternative providers. Money's worth calculations show that the market is efficient by international standards, with a money's worth above 0.9 for the whole period and close to unity by the end of the period. We present conflicting evidence on the existence of adverse selection because although we find money's worths are inversely related to age of purchase, we find that they are positively related to size of purchase.

Suggested Citation

  • Cannon, Edmund & Stevens, Ralph & Tonks, Ian, 2015. "Price efficiency in the Dutch Annuity Market," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:14:y:2015:i:01:p:1-18_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474747213000279/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Morales & Guillermo Larraín, 2017. "The Chilean Electronic Market for Annuities (SCOMP): Reducing Information Asymmetries and Improving Competition," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 42(3), pages 389-405, July.
    2. Jiyeon Yun & Hongmin Zi, 2022. "Analyzing the Selection Effect in the Private Korean Annuity Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Aquilina, Matteo & Baker, Robert & Majer, Tommaso, 2017. "The Money’s Worth of annuities in the UK between 2006 and 2014," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 208-218.
    4. Cannon, Edmund & Tonks, Ian, 2016. "Cohort mortality risk or adverse selection in annuity markets?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 68-81.
    5. Andy Wong & Michael Sherris & Ralph Stevens, 2017. "Natural Hedging Strategies for Life Insurers: Impact of Product Design and Risk Measure," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 84(1), pages 153-175, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jpenef:v:14:y:2015:i:01:p:1-18_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.